back
2 comments
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/05/...
The second article, posted by cat, seems to indicate that DCA works: 4 out 5 patients had their life span extended. What is curious is that follow-up (expensive) double blind tests were not performed. Was it because there was no money to be made because DCA is not patentable or was it because the efficacy was marginal?