I quite like jury trials personally, they're a good mechanism as an authentic people's check on officialdom in my opinion. A similar concept could also serve as a good check on AI by humans I think!
back
1 comments
Already exists in those systems, there's "lay judges" who sit with the judge and have stuff explained to them.
IMO the 12 jurors thing is not ideal. Too many people, and cases can get technical.
One major flaw in jurist system is the deliberation phase where jurists argue with each other and sometimes bully / browbeat / shame one another into voting a certain way. If jurors could simply vote after hearing the case with no group dynamics, it would be more objective.