Yes, but can it prove it? The old fashioned plagiarism problem was solved by finding the original it was copied from. With AI, the falsely attributed work IS original. There in lies…
back
2 comments
AI-generated content can still be traced back to its source. Even though the content may be original, AI-generated works can be identified by their algorithmic patterns, which can be used to determine the source of the work.
ChatGPT wrote that, not me. How do we know we aren't simply reading ChatGPT arguing with itself?
> It is certainly possible for AI models to generate text that appears to be self-referential or self-reflexive. However, it is also possible to trace the source of AI-generated text by examining the specific patterns and characteristics of the text. For example, you can analyze the language and style used in the text, as well as the context in which it was generated, to determine whether it was likely produced by a specific AI model or not. In addition, you can also examine the metadata associated with the text, such as the date and time it was created, to help identify its source.
ChatGPT wrote that. But I'll say that this is a lot easier said than done. This will always be an increasingly difficult cat and mouse game.
It doesn't and it tags nearly everything not written by an 8th grader as written by AI... even this exact article.
Well maybe the article was written using ChatGPT.
Really? Perhaps they updated it, because I got "likely human generated" for the parent article.
"Your GPTZero score corresponds to the likelihood of the text being AI generated: 338.59305536714294 Your text is likely human generated!"