I’m curious about this too.
There are no obvious landmines in the Elm compiler.
I adore using technology that feels “finished”.
I personally view its infrequent updates as its best feature.
back
1 comments
I agree this should be acknowledged.
In this particular case, the workaround is luckily simple:
case String.fromInt n of
Just "-1" -> True
_ -> False
A number is not a string, you should not have to convert to strings like this. Evan's response on that issue is very typical - ask a question, get a negative reaction, completely ignore it and years later zero indication of a fix or change.