https://www.unrv.com/roman-numerals/use-roman-numerals-legal...
Perhaps we have a lawyer on the site who can offer more, search engines really are nearly useless these days.
https://www.unrv.com/roman-numerals/use-roman-numerals-legal...
Perhaps we have a lawyer on the site who can offer more, search engines really are nearly useless these days.
Nowadays the only contract people write by hand is a check, and it preserves the “write the number twice” practice.
I have always seen that as some check sum? I.e. both need to be wrong and the same wrong to mess things up.
There is an interesting decoding aspect where a "M" can never follow a "V" in a roman numeral representation. So its technically very easy to turn a written capital V into a written capital M but its not actually useful in practice.
Also there are word/letter spacing issues where technically one could remove "III" from the end of a numeral but it would probably result in typographically or graphic arts weird looking spacing.
X (10) -> V (5)
C (100) -> L (50)
M (1000) -> D (500)
It's less obvious in prose like this but it helps if you consider that these numbers would normally be drawn with straight lines (e.g. M would often end up looking more like |X| instead of |V|, which explains why cutting it in half would result in |> or D). This is also a handy way of remembering the less frequently used digits like L or D which are harder to remember because they don't really stand for anything (unlike C = centum and M = mille).
And so on.
Using that appending technique works to sneak the year forward in most cases - perhaps that was the intended benefit? We can update the copyright from (say) 1950 to 1951 without any obvious tampering.
I imagine that the ones with preceeding values would be harder though, perhaps XIX -> XX for example
3 -> 8
(non-German) 7 -> 9
(German) 1 -> 4
5 -> 6