> “Why did not they want to give the award to me directly? Sci-Hub is my sole creation; it is not an organization and never had any team. In 1998 they awarded Torvalds, not Linux,” she added.
Definitely understandable, especially considering that the DOJ/FBI were investigating her directly.
- Alexandra Asanovna Elbakyan — EFF Award for Access to Scientific Knowledge
- Library Freedom Project — EFF Award for Information Democracy
- Signal Foundation — EFF Award for Communications Privacy
Yes, it's possible. Their current web gate: https://standard--template--construct-org.ipns.dweb.link/
More info: https://www.reddit.com/r/scihub/comments/13cms8m/how_to_use_...
Btw, using this opportunity to remind everybody about her donation page: https://sci-hub.ru/donate
For the new papers, a significant percentage can be found as preprints in arxiv or the like, or are published in open-access journals, so the difficulty in obtaining them is typically less than for older papers that are still important.
Moreover, even if I pay a non-negligible amount of money for the access at certain journals, I frequently prefer to search for their articles on Scihub, because I can get them so much faster, without wasting time with logins or with searching for articles in the wrong place, because they were published elsewhere.
Annual EFF Awards: Alexandra Elbakyan, Library Freedom Project, and Signal (248 points, 33 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36899608
I can't say that about many organizations.
A lot of the reason that Sci-Hub content has stalled in more recent users is security around accounts (MFA, SAML etc).
The reason there is still a lot of warnings floating around about using Sci-Hub is the threat that publishers hold over Unis in terms of licensing and the users understanding the threat to their accounts/personal data.
The method of getting the papers was bad, even if the reasoning was good.
Hopefully more Universities continue focusing on open access of their research in line with BOAI (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Open_Access_Initiativ...).
How can I claim this?! When both copyrights and patents were invented the longest 'corporate charter' a company could hold was 6 months in total.
Patents and Copyrights were designed to aid fledgling businesses in America compete against the behemoth industrial machines of England, Spain, France, and Europe in general. Companies in those countries were expansionist and simply bought out any serious competition.
Our country's founders didn't want that system taking hold of American economics, so invented protections against such things occurring here.
Remove the copyrights and patents from ANY multinational corporation. If it's not an American-ONLY based company -where money isn't shipped wholesale overseas- then they can no longer enjoy patents or copyrights in America.
POOF... problem solved.
They had zero IP and were building a country on stolen IP, of course they wanted to play fast and loose.
Now that the US has IP and others dont, they are doing what they do best, The World Police.
Now the MPA and copyright holders can dismiss their testimony out of hand for being that group that gave an award to a copyright infringer. Not that the MPA or John Deere would’ve respected the EFF anyway, but I’m sure it’s going to be mentioned in future court cases as a way to discredit the arguments.
The thing I'm against is the government telling me that I can't strip DRM. But I think it's everybody's right to wrap their creations in a puzzle; it's just cheating to get the cops to hit me with a stick if I try to solve that puzzle, or try to tell anyone else how to solve it.
Scihub saves you from finding the email address of one of the authors and waiting for a reply for your request for a copy of the paper.
I'd be surprised and disappointed if a party like the EFF would be against free access to scientific knowledge. That includes educational books on the Internet Archive.
My personal opinion is this: tax dollars pay for a huge proportion of the research that is then reviewed by volunteers (whose pay also comes out of taxes) and then published in journals that charge insane prices to host a PDF of this taxpayer-funded research. Sci-Hub takes this publicly-funded research and makes it available to the public like it always should have been.
The pirates are Elsevier etc.
Q: Do content creators (the scientists and researchers) approve or disapprove of Sci Hub?