back
1 comments
You're talking past each other.

He responded to a statement in the article comparing solar thermal collection with solar + heat pump.

The article mostly talks about mechanical heat pumps, and you leapt to that, talking past him.

(I think both the article and him are not strictly correct: solar thermal heating has a place but is not typically a efficiency win).

The place for solar thermal is probably ease of maintenance. No moving parts means a lot less to go wrong, and a lot cheaper/easier to fix if something does go wrong.

That said, better house design gets you pretty much all the way there, and in places where you cannot design a house to get enough sun to heat it properly you also probably can't get enough for a solar collector to help much.

> The place for solar thermal is probably ease of maintenance.

Can vouch for this. We've gone through three water heaters and a bunch of maintenance on those, and in the same time the solar collector has been replaced zero times and required no maintenance. It's honestly quite impressive.

I could see it being useful in a remote living / off grid scenario as well, especially if you made it yourself out of recycled car parts and scrap.
Can you share the brand and tech ?
Tech: evacuated solar tubes Brand: Apricus

I heavily vouch for them - the tech is so effective we cover them with a shadecloth in high Summer because the water gets too hot (Off-Grid property in Central West NSW, Australia).

Ours have lasted over 10 yrs without maintenance.

One downside is that they're not ubiquitous so some plumbers may not want to work with them.

They're so good I'm surprised I don't see them everywhere.

Solar thermal is also great for e.g. heating pools.