I appreciate the point about seriousness too. One part of it that I liked kind of feels like travel writing from the last century (e.g. John Muir) that goes in and out of various subjects with respect to the main one. On the other hand, the author shows their 'seriousness' and culture by being able to reference and talk about the subject in the context of many other subjects. If I try to do this it probably feels pretentious, so I admire the skill of being able to pull it off.
Focus is a third state in between indifference and distraction: you have said no to everything except one thing.
almost off-topic - re: Bouvard and Pécuchet - i wonder, how much films like Pat & Mat [1] are influenced by this book..
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_%26_Mat
added later: the essay reminded me of this verse:
If you want to do a
certain thing
You first have to be a
certain person.
Once you have become
that certain person
you will not care any more
about doing that certain thing.
- DogenHis ultimate point seems to be that distraction should be viewed more as play rather than an impediment to work. I can agree with this conceptually, but wish I could get my inner monologue and capitalism to as well.
He is attempting to write an essay (the word "essay" itself coming from the French word meaning "to try") about distraction, while being distracted yet somehow talking about other kinds of distraction or not. It's very good. It's like a fuller, less abstract version of the "This is the title of the story, which is also found several times in the story itself."
https://stuff.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/tit...