I see a lot of text-editing environments geared towards "distraction-free, focused editing" but not a lot of innovation on an OS focused on the same experience. I would like to see such a "writing OS" that boots to a text editor in less than a second. Maybe this OS is a candidate?
The hardware compatibility list shows a promising number of machines ( http://www.menuetos.net/hwc.txt ). If you have a spare one, you could try and report. There is a chance that you will achieve a very fast boot time.
--
AROS (Amiga) could reboot in ~7s, ~15yrs ago. And you can do more than you can with MenuetOS. Again, today you will probably break that record.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yNIuNnBrWg
Edit:
You can see here a recent AROS booting in 3s (it is not clear if it is bare metal though):
1.44 MB floppy read times might prevent sub-5-second boots to a GUI, though. I can’t really remember how fast things like that booted from a floppy, anymore.
The virtualbox window is pretty clear to me :D
Anyway: I thought I have here a laptop I have to initialize, maybe I will install IcarOS on it as soon as I will have the time. So, we will see how it behaves on bare metal.
But it's not a practically usable OS, it's more like a study in how far you can get with pure assembly. Though if a text editor is really all you want, it might be good enough.
Is that the kind of experience you'd look for in a distraction-free OS? If not I'd be interested to hear your ideas - I use i3 for work but manage to distract myself anyway because I always have a web browser open.
(You can add such bars in XMonad, just like you can remove them from i3.)
[edit]
And 5 seconds for DHCP if you are using dhcp
Years ago, I found a bootable USB project on Github with a tiny custom Linux kernel that only launched vi. IIRC, my computer's fan was always running full speed with it, though.
Replace nethack with your favourite editor, and it might just work. (Well, also replace the floppy disk with something faster.)
The open source alternative is KolibriOS.
http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=22194
(MenuetOS is Ville's project)
The code was GPL, but kolibri did replace copyright headers and that was Ville's main gripe. Whether or not that breaks the GPL, I cannot say (they kept his name in the license file).
To me, as an outsider to these projects, making the 32-bit version open source and the 64-bit version proprietary feels hostile.
How many years should pass until it doesn't matter if a fork was "hostile" or not and only open source software remains?
But that isn't all that took place; please read the linked post.
I think the author's wishes should be respected above all. Don't you?
Wonder how that would have played out.
baremetal os might be it the one tho
https://github.com/ReturnInfinity/BareMetal
The one you linked to is a fork that is 83 commits behind a repo that is no longer maintained.