Parasitic crustaceans: https://bogleech.com/bio-paracrust
Parasitic jellyfish: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/artful-amoeba/when-jell...
Another parasitic jellyfish (its larva develops inside-out, then turns itself outside-in when it bursts out of its host!): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polypodium_hydriforme
Man: "I'm a marketing manager who lives in the suburbs and commutes to
work on the highway. I live alone, so of course I needed a car that
can seat 12 and is equipped to drive across arctic tundra... it just
makes me feel better!"
Woman: "The new Maibatsu Monstrosity... mine's bigger!"I don't have great links but look at mistletoe https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistletoe and Indian pipe https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotropa_uniflora for example.
Also, a parasitic plant (a green alga) that infects animals: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototheca
And terrifying
The pictures are horrific, lol. One of them looks like a bruised and infected scrotum. ...Actually they both kind of do in different ways.
>> These passengers, it seems, act as the infectious agents, waiting to infiltrate the gills or intestines of a fish that swallows them. The sailors, meanwhile, do the hard work of moving the blob through the water—but in [sic, doing so] sacrifice their own opportunities to reproduce.
That's fascinating! Dr. Ian Malcolm, your quote forever echoes.
A definite scientist advanced in marine biology, just employed in a different laboratory profession so technically not an "actual marine biology professional".
>in his lab, Adameyko would like to learn more
>“These are our night science projects, because we want to have fun in the lab,” he says. “The idea is that there are no limits. And if you want to do something cool, you can.”
Careful, having an attitude like that can impart an unfair advantage so strong that it can draw some blowback from many so-called "serious professional" environments.
For the first time in a lot of time, they used the term mind-boggling accurately. I had never ever seen something like this before in a digenean.
Digeneans by definition aren't segmented animals. If each "petal" of the flower is an animal, then those are clearly segmented and this is very problematic
So either this is not a digenean, or we would need to reclassify an entire class of animals.
If this does not have complex chetae and maybe remains of a mandible then is not a polychaete (but we need to take in mind that both could had been dissolved by the preservative).
This animals seem to have a species of terminal sucker like digeneans have. But I would thing instead in another kind of animals with suckers that are segmented: Several marine leeches feeding on a mass of digenean spores (each one would be filled with digenean undigested DnA, so beware with spreading the analysis too thin!.
Other reasonable possibility IMAO would be a group of leeches producing or incubating a mass of eggs. Leech coccoons are complex structurally and round.
Something is very wrong here
So why don’t the one species die out? When do they reproduce?
> The DNA confirmed that both the sailors and tiny passengers inside the hemisphere belong to the same species.
The "Kin Selection" thing is fairly common in insects.
Most workers and soldiers in hives are sterile females (so when those white-faced hornets swarm your ass, it's "Hell hath no fury" in action).
It's like a Trojan Horse (the weapon of war) and. Trojan Horse (the malware) both in one