back
2 comments
Yes/no. There are sources of bias everywhere ranging from outright pay for play to more subtle types of influence that some companies are better able to exert or just are better at it. (For example, there are a lot of industry awards/Top 100 lists out there that are determined by random people on the Internet voting and who knows how many of those come from some big company PR department encouraging employees to vote for their company's best-place-to-work/product/podcast/etc.?
Right, but then there are also industry awards like the crypto ones which are literally just pay to win.

I trust awards like I trust video game analytics... if the biggest argument they got (in video games) is that you can "walk XXXXX miles" and "XXXXX hours of dialogue" and "XXXXXXX planets you can land on" I immediately assume the game will suck. Because if analytics is what gets people excited about it, anyone can manipulate a turd with good analytics. Same with awards. I can make a crypto tomorrow with an award for "most innovative in X space" within a day. I can even get a celebrity tell everyone how it changed their lives.

This is why advertising sucks, and awards are advertising. Its all about trying to pretend like anything you say has merit.

I work in telcos, and literally all of them are pay-to-win. When I see those badges on a website I consider them "badges of demerit".
Can you trust anything that appears in an ad?
Can we apply the rule of headlines to this comment, so any comment that ends in a question the answer is No? <recursion intended>

From my experience working with ad agencies, on set during production of commercials, being in the edit bay, and just as a person with real world experience, the answer is not just no, but hell no.