- there's no recipe for the cow
- 1/8 of a cow is reported as $0.00
https://recursiverecipes.schollz.com/recipe/refried-beans?am...
For example, if I just click "Refried beans" on the homepage, then click the recipe for "Refried beans" from the ingredients list on that page... it takes pressing Back on the browser FIVE times before I'm finally back at the homepage. And, interestingly, at no point during this process do I actually go back to the actually-previous page (where you land after clicking "refried beans" on the homepage) -- I just stay on the current page as the URL changes every time and then eventually make it all the way back to the homepage with nothing in-between.
I must be getting old. There's no hijacking going on here, the page uses URL params, and probably JS to decode them.
Now I'm trying to find out such examples of actually recursive recipe and I only find examples based on fermentation, which have a way to be bootstrapped but are then actually recursive: kombucha, kefir, vinegar, levain.
Is there anything else?
This recursive dependency is not visualized sadly. Fun website nonetheless!
- 1 unit of vodka
- 2 units of water
- 3 units of Cocktail Recursive
Recursion doesn't imply infinite recursion; a recipe doesn't have to invoke itself to be a recursive recipe. Surely a recursive recipe is just a recipe that invokes a recipe.
This is completely normal; see Escoffier. E.g. for Cod Mornay, "Make a roux".
Escoffier's recipes were often just a single paragraph; you were supposed to know how the target tastes and looks.
Making sourdough is arguably infinitely recursive. You can break the recursion by looking up "Make a sourdough starter".
Throw away the kernels, get more fruit.
I really want to believe this :(
<div class="box ingredient-box clickable nounderline"
onclick="location.href='/recipe/refried-beans';">
<h3>
<span class="display-block">
<a href='/recipe/refried-beans'></a>
Refried Beans
</span>
</h3>
</div>
A more structural HTML, plus modern CSS styling, would work a little better in modern browsers, and degrade better in lightweight and older browsers. <a class="box ingredient-box clickable nounderline"
href="/recipe/refried-beans">
<h3>
<span class="display-block">
Refried Beans
</span>
</h3>
</div>But it lacks all the details. Like how do you work the best with different kind of yeast? How do you know if you got the right texture / amount of liquid? What about all the tricks and tips when working with this kind of baking stuff?
Old school cooking books are often better at this. There the cinnamon bun recipe would be "use the base bun dough from page X, but use only Y amount of ingredient Z". And then on the base recipe, all you need to know about doughs are covered.
Similarly, a recipe with meat will just say "cook until done", and then you need to know yourself how to best sear it, the temperature at which it is done etc.
Perhaps this is a place where LLMs can shine. It can fill in the perfect amount of knowledge for me if I'd ask it.
But there also was always the assumption, that people pick up very basic techniques starting as a child by helping in the kitchen, beeing shown by it and doing it themselves.
I was thinking about this actually; are these actually recursive or just like self referential? But it's a recursive data type!
type Ingredient { ingredients: Ingredient[] }
https://plantuml.pbrinkmeier.de/svg/VP8zJyCm48Rt-nMtCV8b44E5...
Edit: OK, this seems to kinda work by clicking on the ingredient.
Why does a pure text website need websocket functionality?
(Canned beans are fine in a pinch)
Some of the recipes are wrong: for Eggs Benedict: should be: 1 whole muffin : 2 whole egg : 2 whole slice bacon
Show HN: Recursive Recipes – directions to make food from scratch - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17180686 - May 2018 (75 comments)
I don't think my guests will be returning. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs might also pay me a visit if I attempt this.
"Go and buy it."
I get this website is a joke, but it is a pretty bad one.The concept seems interesting. It seems like it’s missing too much information/behavior to explore in an interesting way.