back
3 comments
Plausibly true - but the "do such programs statistically reduce firearm crimes?" analysis is incomplete. Humans and their societies are not numbers.

By the standards of city budgets, firearm buyback programs are not all that expensive. For people with a less-than-wanted firearm in the house, they can be an escape hatch from fear and anxiety. They broadcast some polite and restrained anti-gun messages (not everyone wants guns around, people should have the choice). They can provide healthy, positive citizen <==> police social interactions in places where those are far too rare. And (local politics willing) they're good, symbolic gateways to more substantial and lasting work toward addressing crime and social problems in a city.

We have seen people 3d printing guns and surrendering them for profitm
That sounds to me like a trivial administrative detail, in how the buyback program defines "gun", and the amounts paid. They might accept glue guns, squirt guns, paintball guns, pellet guns, rusted-out muzzle loaders, and more - but only pay $0 for 'em. If some folks bitch about that - tell 'em the city is spending money to reduce crime and social problems, not to subsidize their 3D printing hobby. Go sell take-it-apart puzzles on Etsy, kid.

(From what I've heard: Printed guns are a huge thing in fiction, and ideological and legal battles. But actual usage in real-world gun crimes / accidents / suicides is stuck at 0.0%)