https://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/renting-is-not-a-waste...
And my house is 3k sqft vs the 800 I had in the city. And that space is put to work: Proper office, guestroom, gym room, much larger and nicer kitchen (which in turn saves me even more money because I cook more), charcoal grill outside, room for more guitars and drums, proper dining room for hosting family gatherings, a porch I can sit and smoke on. The list goes on.
Grocery store is walkable and the neighborhood is nice to walk in for exercise. City experiences are 20-40 min away depending on which city I wanna hang out in. I guess I have to have a car but I had one in the city anyways since I liked to drive to destinations around Seattle. It's an old Civic still kicking so it's pretty cheap all told.
For the same money per month, locked in for years. If I renewed my lease in 2020 during the pandemic instead of owning, I'd be materially less well off.
Do you realize that you would be paying over 50% more per month for that same mortgage today?
Would you still consider that a super good deal that you can't imagine anyone not taking?
Rate lock-in isn't that great with a high interest rate, because you are going to need to pay thousands to refinance.
I get where you're coming from, but it's a different analysis today than it was 3 years ago.
But this article is about "Forever" Renters. I highly doubt buying a house will never be worth it if you follow the above path.
But.
What it leaves out is by purchasing you’ve essentially fixed your cost of housing.
Which is important when you consider.
1. Inflation
2. The ever increasing wealth divide allowing landlords to charge more for rent knowing their tenants can never qualify for the alternative of buying their own home instead.
This is something I wish I understood earlier.
As a renter, these costs are essentially passed on to you anyway, so there's functionally no difference.
When you sign a 12 month lease, you know more or less how much you'll spend towards housing for the next year and it's easy to accurately predict a cost ceiling.
When you own a home, you know the minimum you'll spend is the mortgage+taxes but in an unlucky year your AC goes out and you get a hole in the roof that insurance doesn't cover and suddenly you've spent 20k that you didn't plan on.
A house doesn't have that many things that can go wrong with it that would be unforseen expenses.
AC, water pipe leak, appliance breakdown, roof replacement. None of these cost above $8k, and for bigger things there is home insurance (e.g. tree fell on a house). Many of these things can be mitigated with a cheap fix that will last you those 12 months until you have the funds to do it properly.
Also, I see this sentiment a lot from people who have no problem dropping a $15-20k down payment on an car, but somehow spending that money for home maintenance is "scary" and "unpredictable".
You’ve fixed the minimum cost of your housing. You need to budget for unpredictable extras.
With renting, I know my maximum spend over a shorter timeline.
Buying a place to live is ridiculously affordable in US comparing to other developed nations.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/upshot/buy-rent-cal...
If you don't own your home, you don't own your life.
Sounds like a civil suit for invasion of privacy to me (at least in the US). And if I just got lucky, then stronger renters laws are needed.
If there are arguments in favor of renting, this definitely isn't it.
Where do you draw the limit? Because you could justify being a forever renter about anything with your logic.
Being a forever renter is being dependent on the whim of those who lend you "your" stuff. It's only natural that many people do not want that kind of lifestyle.