So frustrating to see people are not learning from the past that these legalese phrases are NEVER as bad as they sound.

It seems this never gets old, does it? How often has this phrasing caused issues - and then when it's clarified it turns out it's just paranoid legalese giving them the right to show you your content to yourself on a public internet terminal etc.

I can recall these "Oh no! Read the terms!" articles for at least Dropbox, Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest, maybe for others. Each time it turns out to be harmless.

Seriously - do you REALLY think Google a) wants the rights to publicly perform your MP3s or display your pictures and b) even if they did, that they're stupid enough to think this wouldn't cause an outrage.