Item — HN Reader

Well… the generated image has this seductive vibe to it as if she’s trying to start an onlyfans account. This isn’t a National Geographic image.

Even set that aside and it’s still an example of an outcome that an AI was specifically prompted not to produce.

Paired with the article about Israel’s use of AI to make wartime targeting decisions and it feels super problematic.

1 comments

> it’s still an example of an outcome that an AI was specifically prompted not to produce.

There is no evidence of such prompting.

They said in the article they’d prompted it to avoid nudity. I tend to believe that because it makes sense for a promotional website connected to a state agency.

I see only:

"Prior to launch, we agreed to a comprehensive set of rules to govern image creation, including that people in images be fully clothed."

> it makes sense for a promotional website connected to a state agency.

The thing that makes most sense for them is to claim they made an effort...