They said in the article they’d prompted it to avoid nudity. I tend to believe that because it makes sense for a promotional website connected to a state agency.
back
1 comments
I see only:
"Prior to launch, we agreed to a comprehensive set of rules to govern image creation, including that people in images be fully clothed."
> it makes sense for a promotional website connected to a state agency.
The thing that makes most sense for them is to claim they made an effort...