▲ 223 points
back
59 comments
For a good introduction to developing an intuition about special relativity via low speed of light, I really recommend George Gamow’s “Mr Tompkins in Wonderland” (or “in paperback”). These short stories explore things like how the world would look if the speed of light were 10 mph.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr_Tompkins
> Four Books in the Series
>
1940: Mr Tompkins in Wonderland
1945: Mr Tompkins Explores the Atom
1953: Mr Tompkins Learns the Facts of Life
1967: Mr Tompkins Inside Himself
Also from Gamow, and something that blew my (then) 12 year old mind: 1-2-3-Infinity
Wow thank you I cant believe I've been ignorant of this my whole life. Thank you so much
Also see Redshift Rendezvous by John E. Stith. It's a novel, not a tutorial, but relativistic effects play a major part at several points.
But does that make any physical sense? All the other speeds we are familiar with would be proportionally slower, since they are all ultimately determined by fractions of the speed of light, right? For example, if the speed of light were 10mph, the speed of sound would be something like 0.6in/h, days would be much, much longer, chemical reactions would take hours etc. Overall, I don't think it would really make any difference for a human in this world: everything would actually be perfectly identical.
I don't know whether it makes physical sense. There are other fundamental constants, too. Changing just "c" might lead to stuff like "atoms can't exist" or "the universe as we understand it would not evolve," etc. Or, not.
Changing "c" is different from just changing your units.
Yes, changing c would definitely lead to stuff like "reality does not exist as we know it".
c goes into many other constants and determines most of the laws, especially in e&m. Realistically, atoms would not be able to hold up against the pressure to collapse, pretty much all matter (if it still existed) would condense to very very very cold solids instantly. We'd be shut out of most light from the sun for potentially hundreds of thousands of years.
I'm just starting my big graduate theoretical physics journey so i really can't do all the relativistic quantum math yet, take what i say with a grain of salt!
I think the actual answer to your question is that the outcome you're hypothesizing would be absolutely useless for teaching the reader about relativistic effects, so there's no reason for someone to write such a book for a lay audience.
Why would these dependent on the speed of light?
Related game
Velocity Raptor (2012): https://www.testtubegames.com/velocityraptor.html
Previously discussed:
- "Velocity Raptor – an adventure in 2+1 dimensions" (Mar 2015, 39 comments): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9247460
I am pleasantly surprised to see this still online (ported from Flash to HTML5).
There was once a flash game that integrated principles of relativity into its mechanics for teaching purposes. It was a series of 2D rooms with the goal being to move from point A to B. I remember there being changing distances as well as colors, for example moving a certain way would change the color of a lock so that the key of that color could unlock it. It was good fun, and it was written by a physicist and hosted on a humble personal site. I can't remember where I saw it, but if anyone knows the reference, please share a link.
Was it Velocity Raptor? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40342086
Yes! Thank you! It's a wonderful game!
Cool concept, but this game made me start to feel sick by the 5 minute mark when I finished it.
The next version could be what happens as alpha approaches exactly 1/137.
My understanding (as a layperson) is that if the fine structure constant changes even a little bit, you basically don’t have atoms or molecules as we understand them. So the game would be something like:
a=1/1: Nothingness as far as the eye can see
…
a=1/136: Nothingness as far as the eye can see
a=1/137: BOOM! Life, the universe and everything
Maybe I’m off, and maybe I have the numbers backwards (again, I’m a layperson), but I feel like the speed of light may be an unusual case among universal constants in that you can actually show an interesting gradient of effects as it changes.
That is not how I remember physics (former PhD student here):
The speed of light has a dimension, so it in itself does not change physics (thought experiment: everybody switches to feet-per-decade as the unit of choice, nothing really changes). It is the dimensionless constants that determine the real physics.
Have not heard the statement that is alpha was a tiny factor larger/smaller that would make atoms no longer exist. It's this were true, this would actually be a way to actually calculate it from first principles ('at which value of alpha are there solutions to this equation'). Edit: typo
There is the Hoyle state, a peculiar resonance state that is very important for nucleosynthesis. Without it, stars would not produce a lot of carbon. It appears to be finely tuned for complex chemistry and thus life to evolve.
Wikipedia says the the strong force must be within 0.5% of some value and the finestructure constant within 4%: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe#Carbon_and...
Your memory is playing tricks on you.
The speed of light does change physics, as does any fundamental constant. Expressing a speed in different units does indeed yield different numbers, but that is not equivalent to a change of speed.
Changing alpha means that electromagnetic force get stronger or weaker, thus the atoms still exist but with different orbital levels. Considering how intricate the orbital levels of atoms are, it's not shocking that a tiny change in alpha completely redefines chemistry, but chemistry would still exist.
The fine structure constant is dimensionless and would be different if c were different. When doing a unit conversion, one also has to alter other constants so as to be consistent with observed reality; whether one alters other constants or not is the difference between talking about a change in units and a change in c.
Not an expert here, what is alpha ?
It might be a more fundamental constant than the speed of light as it relates the properties of space time and energy.
At some point if you change the speed of light the information exchange inside of atoms would be disrupted and the system collapses.
Another game in this vein of "teaching math/physics through gameplay" is Hyperbolica, where you explore a 3D world with hyperbolic (and later spherical) geometry. It's mind bending.
Oh wow!
I remember this thing from forever ago!
Very cool concept
This thing was a monster to try to run on computers of the day when it came out.
Heh - 'core 2 duo' .. that's about 2005 vintage isn't it? Should be nice and smooth on modern hardware.
What would happen if say you were traveling 1 m/s and the speed of light was 2m/s?
I imagine there has to be some special properties when youre at exactly half, or some other special ratio of the speed of light
Ratios only matter in vibrations (frequencies) because the vibration is a non-uniformity within a period. Translational speed isn't like that.
The main point of special relativity (Lorenz transform) is that it is a mapping between [0, c] and [0, infinity], so ratios to speed of light are not absolutely definable. Light has infinite speed in its own reference frame.
> Light has infinite speed in its own reference frame
This also means that from the perspective of photon, everything happens instantaneously.
> Light has infinite speed in its own reference frame.
Or alternatively, light doesn't have a reference frame.
Not really AFAIK, since it's an asymptote regarding your speed vs speed of light, so it's a pretty continuous curve. The point where things become weird is at close to the speed of light so in your example at like 1.9~1.999 m/s, and physics "break" at 2m/s, but there's not a sigle point between 0~1.999 where anything "surprising" happens.
I feel like your field of vision expanding and everything around you freezing might be considered surprising. These don't become noticeable until near the top end.
Things get "weird" non uniformly at all the various fuzzy intervals where the effects of relativity are significant in scale compared to the measurement error, in time and space dimension, of whatever phenomena you are studying or experiencing. There are many of these phenomena at different scales, and which ones you care about is subjective.
Could we create a vacuum tube and accelerate macroscopic objects in this tube close to the speed of light?
I know I've seen YouTube videos about that
maybe this one?
I've been curious what a version of this based on general relativity would be like and whether that would be interesting.
Playing this game on my 27” iMac was the first time I experienced nausea from motion sickness. I felt ill for two days.
Player beware!
Sir, we have reached alpha centurion, please use the puke bag.
Funny that it doesn't use the MIT license
Its underlying library, OpenRelativity, does.
Native port for Linux :)
Note it comes as a .tgz but is really only a tar file, not gzipped
Tested to work on a core2duo cpu…
Oh wait... 2012...
(2012)