Pretty much everything you said makes sense.
> Jim Cramer is kinda of an idiot, but buying NVDA at about $75 (or whatever it was then) back then was actually incredibly good advice (life changing advice really, that was quite an ideal time to make those plays).
This is the only thing I'd caveat, as it seems to suggest he gives good advice. I feel it's more benefit of hindsight; it's hard to pick winners from stocks, there tends to be only a few out of the many that are losers. Also glanced over this Reddit post which shows how he's underperformed the S&P500: https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/109cswl/inv...