For example, I have have a bit of a problem with the use of the author’s. ’we’ «Instead of deep processes of discovery, we make minimalistic versions of movie posters» Well, i don’t do that. I can’t identify with this image of the designer, even if I know it works for some people as I see these blogs too.
Look at http://www.manystuff.org/ and http://dribbble.com/
Both sites targeted to designers, but obviously not to the same people.
«I am worried that designers as a group are starting to have the wrong conversations with form.»
Designers as a group don‘t exist. So which kind designers are having what kind of relationship with form?
That we are surrounded by images made by other people shouldn’t necessary be a problem: we learn through imitation. So what is different this time around?
Or when people start to put typefaces on Github for collaborative development https://github.com/klepas/open-baskerville (disclaimer: i work on this project), or when Design collectives start to work with libre toolsets http://osp.constantvzw.org/ (disclaimer: i work in this collective)
I just see a really interesting time where the world of software technology is opening up and becoming more accessible, and designers are finally in the position to appropriate and make their own all this technological change.