Proliferation of third party ARM designs is unlikely to ever happen now.
What I'm personally bothered about is the use of proprietary apps that are already provided for Linux on x86, and frankly no one will bother to build them for RISC-V.
Frankly apart from gamers it is not very common to use proprietary apps on Linux. I could still count my installed proprietary apps with my fingers if I was a limb amputee.
Gamers choose their hardware based on the games they want to play, not the opposite anyway so they are just not the target market.
Welcome to our pain in OpenPOWER world, though at least we have the weight of IBM to encourage some ports, and for the big Power chips emulation is still reasonably practical.
And Apple, look I get that the MBAs view PC/Notebooks as a non-growth industry, but it is still huge, and Apple may be scraping the barrel on iPhones. Why sit on hardware AND OS that is generally better than everyone elses in the consumer space?
Linux on ARM at this point is in a more mature state than Windows with most distros having a huge percentage of packages available for ARM.
The average Linux user runs code from the distribution's packages, built for the architecture Linux runs on.
Can't tell what build they used in the benchmarks, though.
As usual.
Galaxy s24 (a phone) can run fallout 4.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S24-Ultra-runs-...