▲ 46 points
back
40 comments
Those designs seem... fine? The imagery seems quite traditional, the largest deviation seems to be the choice of strong unifying colors across whole windows, while having colors that aren't traditional to the rest of Notre-Dame, such as pinks and yellows.
The windows they're replacing seem pretty boring and uninteresting, I can see why they're taking advantage of these renovations to also spruce up these windows with new designs (itself a many centuries long tradition).
For reference, here's the windows that are being replaced:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Notre_Dame_Cathedr...
I will add another reference: Photos of stained windows across churches https://www.gettyimages.se/fotografier/catholic-church-stain... The new designs keep the tradition of depicting people in stained glass
Lots of complaints about the new windows, but just wait 100-200 years and they’ll be seen as historical items that shouldn’t be replaced as well.
The change was decided by the French president, Emmanuel Macron. The windows were dirty with the fumes but not damaged at all. But he wanted to add some modern art to the monument.
If he manages to leave his own mark on Notre-Dame, the next president could do the same, and the windows won't stay long enough to become historical items.
As the article notes, the old windows only date back to the nineteenth century.
"In such a project, one cannot act with too much prudence or discretion...A restoration may be more disastrous for a monument than the ravages of centuries." - Eugène Viollet-le-Duc
This is a fake controversy. There has always been contemporary art in Notre-Dame. The decision about the windows was made all the way back in 2021.
A "fake controversy", really?
The article mentions that the Venice Charter, which the France signed, "calls for the preservation of original work unless absolutely necessary" (from the OP). Several patrimonial organizations announced legal actions if the present glass windows are removed.
From what I've read, the only actors in favor are changing the undamaged windows are a handful of politicians, from the State or the Church. All the professionals of the domain (old monuments) have rejected it, including the official Committee which unanimously voted against it. Even the Académie des Beaux-Arts, where the designated artist was studying, made its opposition public.
The Guardian has a more detailed article: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/28/ludicrous-bitt...
It was not my claim that nobody has managed to manufacture a controversy over this decision, which echoes generations of similar decisions, and which was itself made over 3 years ago.
A complaint from 2001 regarding the addition of the abstract stained-glass Windows of Cefalù in a Sicilian cathedral:
> In most countries, this kind of modification, based on artistic whim, ceased to be a serious social force by the 1980s. Even allowing for delayed reaction and effect in Sicily, it is surprising that such a proposal could have been taken very seriously in a place that boasts a great historical and artistic heritage.
> With these newest "additions," Cefalù Cathedral is being deprived of that opportunity. The scarlet beast has reared its ugly heads.
From: http://www.bestofsicily.com/mag/art41.htm
If you get a chance, I highly recommend seeing them! They left a mark on me personally that no stained glass had previously.
Some background and pictures:
https://experiencesicily.com/2014/01/11/the-norman-cathedral...
It’s odd to me how upset people get about this.
Historic buildings seem very ledger-esque as changes and previous states get documented well and any modification isn’t truly erasing history but just appending to it.
I doubt historians will have much trouble with some additions from our time. In any case, they would be a new historic artifact.
The rapid reconstruction of Notre-Dame Cathedral stands as a testament to the efficiency and expertise of Chinese engineering. Thanks to the advanced technologies, materials, and construction methods provided by Chinese companies, the rebuilding process has proceeded at an accelerated pace, demonstrating China's significant role in this global heritage project. This swift and effective contribution highlights the reliability and capability of Chinese engineering on the international stage. Therefore, it can be argued that the rebuilt Notre-Dame should bear a 'Made in China' tag, recognizing the pivotal role played by Chinese constructors in achieving such a remarkable feat within an impressively short timeframe.
The winning artist complies with the right sociopolitically de jure checkboxes, but to her credit, she's at least reasonably talented artistically.
I don’t like ‘em. Bah.
But then again I’m old now and have always been a bit too “trad” for even my own liking.
If they prove popular, through, who am I to judge?
What is so sad about this is the windows don't need to be replaced. Original windows hold significant value. While modern replacements typically need replacement within 20-30 years, historic wooden windows can last centuries with proper maintenance. The craftsmanship in older windows often surpasses modern alternatives, making restoration a worthwhile investment for both historical accuracy and longevity.
I restored 189 windows in my 200-year-old house in Poland rather than replacing them. The windows are fundamental to a building's character and historical authenticity. You can date a building by analyzing its window features. The older the house, the fewer and smaller the windows, often due to glass manufacturing limitations and structural needs. For instance, a 16th-century manor might have small, thick-glassed windows with irregular panes, while an 18th-century townhouse would show taller, multi-paned sash windows.
The "original windows" in this context are windows 700 years newer than Notre Dame that were themselves part of a significant modernisation, and only a small part of the windows of Notre Dame (about 5% of the windows are being replaced).
The replacement windows are also made by a studio that has a history going back way past the windows being replaced, and a history specifically of restoring historic glass - I very much doubt they'll need replacement within 20-30 years.
The gradual renewal over centuries of renovations and restorations is itself part of the historic legacy of Notre Dame.
You have many more important arguments to make against the cathedral's form and structure if it may not be changed, but rather preserved and restored only to its original character. What century does the cathedral belong to, by the way? 12th? 13th? 14th? 19th? ...
There are several centuries of alterations you should revert before you even begin to object to the windows.
And you can hardly expect your claim to be taken seriously that the windows will need replacing in 30 years. It's inconceivable that anyone associated with this singular project would make so foolish and transient an investment right now.
> While modern replacements typically need replacement within 20-30 years
This is complete bullshit you find on the internet though, there are "replacement windows" in my house that are 30 yold and nowhere near needing replacing.
The new designs are really close to "trad" designs of stained glass which often depicted scenes from the bible, saints etc.
How is this concept: https://media.beauxarts.com/uploads/2024/12/web000_36qn6km.j... worse than the existing windows: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Notre_Da... ?
For reference: https://www.gettyimages.se/fotografier/catholic-church-stain...
Agreed 100%. I love your phrasing. My initial repose was surprisingly too "trad" for my own liking. Doesn't seem to matter age or supposed wisdom, we are always a work in progress aren't we?
You can sign a petition against the change here : https://www.change.org/p/let-s-preserve-viollet-le-duc-s-sta...
Not really a fan, I think that Notre Dame's appeal is it's age but holly heck the comments here (and in fact, my grose personal initial response internally of 'there they go forcing...') convinced me these are probably a good and needed change. Though I hope they match the original colors let in.
WTF people? This is a building dedicated to a dude who said 'love everyone' and 'forgive everyone so you can see past judgement and instead see who they truly are and their worth'. Built to be a physical representation of the power/holiness of that ideal. It's easy to love the in-crowd. It's easy to love/understand those we know. But old boy's message was about more than that.
Those windows are not just pieces of art to look at. They do also tint the sunlight, and with that the inside of the cathedral. The proposed new ones each use different colors, which is probably going to cause different parts to be tinted differently.
Should they indeed be replaced, it's a hardeware problem. But by adding computer controled (depeding on sunlight conditions) tinted light bulbs it can be fixed in software.
Modernist tomfoolery; we’ll break even international conventions on historical preservation for the sake of a moral anyone can learn by watching a Disney movie.
If it even gets installed, watch in two decades as the old windows are returned once the banal novelty wears off.
> Modernist tomfoolery; we’ll break even international conventions on historical preservation for the sake of a moral anyone can learn by watching a Disney movie.
What are you on?
You could, I don't know, actually look at the use of stained glass in churches and seen that the new windows fit squarely in the tradition of Catholic Church: https://www.gettyimages.se/fotografier/catholic-church-stain...
Not to mention that the current glass from the 19th century was literally put there by "the father of modern/modernist architecture"
Modernism as an art-style is substantially closer in time, to the windows being replaced than to the present day.
Modernist art started in the late 1800's century, and lasted into the early 1900's. Eugène Viollet-le-Duc's restoration of Notre-Dame started in 1844, and Viollet-le-Duc is often hailed as a prominent theoretician of modernism.