Over the last 25 years I've spent hundreds of hours fighting with its bugs. Not free by a long shot.
> it's stable.
Anything but.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues
> it's easier to use.
You must be joking right? A step in any direction and you must use CLI.
> it doesn't have adds.
Windows neither has "adds".
> it uses less resources.
Proofs required.
> it runs on older hardware.
Good luck using Firefox or Chrome on "older hardware". Good luck watching videos on older hardware that lacks HW H.265/VP9 decoding. Older hardware for what? For NAS? Why would you need desktop Linux on it?
> it doesn't contain spyware.
Prove that Windows spies on you. And also, Windows is used by NSA/CIA/FBI and pretty much all governments of the world some of which are openly hostile to the US. So much for "spyware".
> it doesn't violate my privacy.
See earlier.
> it includes more powerful features.
Examples or bust.
> it offers more alternatives for the GUI.
Windows has had CLI for aeons and now not just one but many including Bash (WSL).
> i can trust it because the kernel has been audited.
That's an abject lie.
> it is way easier to configure to my personal preferences.
And Windows doesn't need configuration as it just works.
> it allows me to replace or remove any application that i don't like.
What would you like to replace in Windows that's not "replaceable"? Examples or bust.