back

by yamrzou·1y ago·view on hn ↗
It seems that those ideas are mainly optimizing for making sure that the group of people in positions of authority will be diffuse, flexible, open, and temporary, or what she calls "democratic structuring" in the essay.

If one wants a default, well-tested structure, hierarchy seems to be a good candidate[1]. Another idea is to optimize for viability, meaning the ability to adapt to and survive changes in the environment, described by the Viable System Model[2].

I wonder if there are studies on the different ways of structuring and their goals and tradeoffs.

[1] Choose Boring Culturehttps://charity.wtf/2023/05/01/choose-boring-technology-cult...

[2] Tools for Viable Organizinghttps://vsru.org/articles/tools-for-viable-organizing.html

1 comments
"Heirarchy" describes a set of power and/or decision-making and/or accountability relationships.

It does not describe how the individuals who hold particular positions within the heirachy may change over time, which is a central part of the ideas Joreen gets to in the latter part of the essay.

Or in click-bait terms: you can have heirarchy without heirarchy :)