I have always believed that the role of a bureaucracy is to make changes slow. In the far extreme, it leads to red-taping, corruption, and obscurity and presumably that's why one's first response would always be to advocate for more efficiency and cuts. However, there's a reason that virtually every bureaucracy in this planet is slow. Not one, not two, but all of them are not designed, rather devolve over time to such a state. The reason is that any change you make at such a level has tremendous consequences flowing downstream to every single level so you need time to plan, review, and document (for accountability) such changes. Plainly, that's not happening right now. I just wish that people who were doing this would stop and think for a while on the difference between the consequence of tanking a social media company versus tanking a government. I sure would be glad to be proved wrong and see it all work out though.