back
86 comments
Working memory is waaaay more critical than you might think to all levels of functionality. There are many basic tasks, like walking to another room to get something and noticing something minor, like a pen on a table that should be put away, and doing both tasks, that depend on working memory. The same with mentaly reasoning through a complex system. The reason abstractions are so valuable is that they allow for compression of something into working memory.

For me, personally, this is why I often approach things by scaffolding them into relationships with existing structures (mentally) - by integrating with an existing structure, I avoid a sort of fragmentation overload in my working memory.

Anyway, I think it's one of those things you don't really notice until it goes bad somehow.

Multiple small kids are incredibly disruptive to this. Just, a continuous "happening", constant out-of-context asks and "situations". 5 different things can happen between noticing or thinking of a task and being able to do anything about it. God help you if you have to go from one room to another because that in itself requires explanations (the best case is they quietly follow you to find out whats going on).

There are long stretches of my day where functionally, I have no free working memory at all. The main way I stay barely functional is by keeping memory "in the state of the world". The way I remember I promised to fix the tap today is by placing the tool kit prominently next to the tap, etc. As a last resort I try to write things down.

Working memory being terrible is one of the biggest issues I experience with my ADHD.

I forgot why I went somewhere, or worse I do something different upon arrival.

> The reason abstractions are so valuable is that they allow for compression of something into working memory.

I wonder if people with smaller working memory necessarily have more organized mental models, to facilitate the compression. People with autism [1] and ADHD [2] tend to have decreased working memory. Are their mental models more "optimized" for compression?

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7071553/

[2] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7483636/

> Anyway, I think it's one of those things you don't really notice until it goes bad somehow.

So true!

Yeah, totally agree, working memory is basically the brain's RAM, and when it's running low, everything slows down.
ADHD makes a mockery of working memory. The number of times I'll have to go back to see what the the fourth, fifth and sixth digit of a six digit sequence were is truly frustrating.

The article indicates that working memory can be improved though, going to have to give that a try.

> ADHD makes a mockery of working memory.

Honestly, I don't find I have much of a problem with working memory. Sure, my ability to recall a meaningless number several minutes later is absolutely terrible, but a handling an analysis or conversation about a complicated subject (complex is a different matter that relies on raw intelligence more than working memory) with lots of important detail seems to be easier for me, to the point where other people tap out with "information overload" when I'm moving along just fine.

Of course, executing a complicated process is a whole different matter, because the ADHD brain quickly loses interest and focuses on something else.

Might still be worth trying, though!
Regarding unconscious thinking: I've known for many years that if I'm trying to implement something and what I'm doing just feels wrong and I'm not sure why, it's time to stop and come back first thing in the morning. Sleeping on it engages my back-brain; and invariably the next morning everything makes sense, sometimes immediately, and sometimes with just a small amount of work.

Mind you, the solution I have in mind when I wake isn't necessarily the right one; but I get to the right one pretty quickly.

I get this even on a shorter timescale with compiler errors. So many times I have a near-subconscious feeling that something's wrong with the code, and as soon as I run or compile it, there it is, a syntax error. I've been trying to train myself to pay more attention to these gut feelings, so I can act on them before the compiler gets to it.
Time, doorways, and ritualized actions like sweeping, brushing your teeth, washing your hair, or walking tend to trigger those connections. Even going for a walk might set you right.

That’s usually when I would go for coffee when I worked in an office.

Ever tried deliberately priming your brain before bed? Like reviewing the problem briefly before sleeping?
I fell into this trap for a while:

> "The grow­ing trend, espe­cial­ly among young peo­ple, to mul­ti-task may seem won­der­ful. But actu­al­ly, mul­ti-task­ing is most like­ly to inter­fere with focused atten­tion and, in turn, degrade mem­o­ry for­ma­tion, recall, and think­ing quality."

Eventually I realized that parallelization is not really possible, you end up making a mess of everything, and trying to be a rapid context-switcher - similar to the illusion of simultaneous multitasking on a single CPU core - just takes too much energy and time - 15-30 min to unload, clear the slate and reload with something else seems common.

Practically, this is why people working on difficult problems that require their full attention get really irritated by interruptions, and often prefer to work in isolation or only with like-minded individuals.+

I love multitasking - I feel like I'm doing more than 100% and I like being productive.

The trick is to pick a combinations that works:

* listening to a language lesson when cycling (learning+sport)

* repeating flash cards in a bus, instead of doomscrolling (commute+learning)

* listening to a language lesson when cycling to work (learning+sport+commute - whoa!)

* thinking about my programming project when cleaning my home (work+brainless menial work)

In most cases this involves something that doesn't require to much too much conscious attention and something that does.

Constantly ctrl-z just to see what I was doing a second ago.

ADHD is a blessing and a curse. I can hold every line of the codebase in my head but I can't remember what I was just doing...

You figure out how to work without working memory. Just offload it all immediately.

Treat reality as working memory substrate
> I can hold every line of the codebase in my head but I can't remember what I was just doing...

The lines of the codebase are also working memory, no?

Especially on home projects, I push commits frequently as a second layer of Ctrl-Z.
Every time I have googled for it, the only method of working memory training that comes up is N-Back.

So I'm happy that the article mentions another method. Apart from playing "Simon" (yes that circular game with lights), those are the only two I know.

Anyone know of any other methods?

I am a bit confused by this approach.

From what I've read, the training isn't necessarily transferable. You just get better at these sorts of brain games, which doesn't necessarily mean your working memory is increasing.

Even while reading gwern's blog that seemed pretty positive of this kind of training, there was limited evidence that you shouldn't learn just a new instrument or language or new sort of math discipline.

Why do people keep thinking that "training" can improve working memory?

I wanted to look at one of the links in that page about memory training in adults.

It's ironic that the page didn't exist and I had to go to a backup from 2014 in archive.org to find it.

https://sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/04/22/working-memory-train...

https://web.archive.org/web/20140713110043/http://sharpbrain...

Yeah, I've always heard about N-Back too, but I've never actually tried it. I had no idea "Simon" was considered memory training
Gwern has a lot of research and meta-research about this (if memory serves, hah), and in general I seem to recall that doing brain games like dual-n-back makes you better at brain games like dual-n-back.

Which is perhaps not without merit, but...

Concur seeing same research, a thought in the back of my head - does learning one of these games makes you faster at learning other games? Does that translate at learning faster in areas that would use similar recall patterns. There is some research that when you learn N>5 languages (https://news.mit.edu/2024/mit-study-polyglots-brain-processi...) the brain layout changes. What happens when you practice / master >X memory recall games.
Link to Gwern's article: Dual n-Back FAQ - https://gwern.net/dnb-faq
I have found that setting to myself a limited, 30 or 40min window, where i am not allowing myself to do anything else but the task I have to do, is actually a sensible way to trick the brain to work on things. Then i swith context. Like coding for 30min,then filling a visa application
Reminds me of the "Hammock Driven Development" talk from Rich Hickey:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f84n5oFoZBc&t=1270s

>Imagine dialing a phone number by having to look up each digit one at a time in the phone book

This was me for the first 38 years of my life. I got a degree and worked as a software developer with memory that bad.

How did you manage it?
Being a caretaker for someone with Alzheimer’s has been a real eye opener to how critical working memory is. I think a large portion of our personal success in life is contingent on our working memory or the ability to manage it effectively.
I actually think this is a danger with leaning more heavily on AI tools. What happens as you offload more of your thinking outside of your brain?
You open up other spaces. Society mostly distracts you with busy work. It’s really psychotic to have someone do anything for 8 hours a day.

Think of it like this. You have other rooms in your house that you don’t know what to do with. You might know how to decorate your first room, maybe even your second, but by the time you are lucky enough to have the fifth room, you won’t really know what to fill it with.

Luxury. It takes some imagination to fill it.

Ever hear of the curse of Thoth in relation to Plato on the merit of writing?
"The training task to expand working memory capacity consisted of presenting a digit or a word item for a second, with one-second intervals between items. For example, a sequence might be 5, 8, 4, 7, with one-second intervals between each digit. Test for recall could take the form of “Where in the sequence was the 4?” or “What was the third item?” Thus students had to practice holding the item sequence in working memory. With practice, the trainers increased the number of items from 3 to 8.

After training, researchers tested the children on another working memory task. Scores on this test indicated that working memory correlated with IQ test scores. That is, children with better working memory ability also had higher IQs."

> when only four attributes were involved, subjects in the conscious-thought condition made the best choice of car.

> But when the complex condition of 12 attributes, results reversed. The best car was chosen most reliably in the unconscious-thought condition.

I failed to understand this.

I must admit I was a little surprised when I first realised this to be true. It's rather unnerving to discover that the most intelligent part of your mind is operating without you knowing about it.
The bit about training working memory to boost IQ is cool, but I wonder how long those effects actually last. Like, do you keep the gains, or does it fade if you stop training?
I wonder how these results would change if working memory was augmented, e.g. by giving participants a notepad.
I came here wondering if anybody was going to comment on the recent post that says that smoking marijuana reduces working memory
> We know that the subconscious mind is processing information (i.e. “thinking”) all the time, even while we sleep. The evidence for this kind of “sleep learning” is incontrovertible and summarized in my memory improvement book...

No. Just the opposite. A quick search shows majority of the scholarly papers question "sleep learning". Maybe 16 years of new data?

e.g., https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2869....

and, as @joeyagreco noted the link is (might as well be) dead.

> see http://thankyoubrain.com

oh... oh god

For others: it is supposed to be a website promoting the article author's book, but since it is from (2008), the link is now to an Indonesian slots website.
The referencesd book is “Thank You Brain, for All You Remember: What You Forgot Was My Fault” by William Robert Klemm, Benecton Press, 2004, ISBN 0975522507.
Can working memory actually be improved as this article suggests? Links to apps to change my life please.
Absolutely. I find having a notebook open when writing/debugging code is a godsend. Just keeping a scratchpad of design notes/ideas/tests while I work let's me keep a lot more in my head. Think of it as increasing your level 1 cache. :)