For me, personally, this is why I often approach things by scaffolding them into relationships with existing structures (mentally) - by integrating with an existing structure, I avoid a sort of fragmentation overload in my working memory.
Anyway, I think it's one of those things you don't really notice until it goes bad somehow.
There are long stretches of my day where functionally, I have no free working memory at all. The main way I stay barely functional is by keeping memory "in the state of the world". The way I remember I promised to fix the tap today is by placing the tool kit prominently next to the tap, etc. As a last resort I try to write things down.
I forgot why I went somewhere, or worse I do something different upon arrival.
I wonder if people with smaller working memory necessarily have more organized mental models, to facilitate the compression. People with autism [1] and ADHD [2] tend to have decreased working memory. Are their mental models more "optimized" for compression?
So true!
The article indicates that working memory can be improved though, going to have to give that a try.
Honestly, I don't find I have much of a problem with working memory. Sure, my ability to recall a meaningless number several minutes later is absolutely terrible, but a handling an analysis or conversation about a complicated subject (complex is a different matter that relies on raw intelligence more than working memory) with lots of important detail seems to be easier for me, to the point where other people tap out with "information overload" when I'm moving along just fine.
Of course, executing a complicated process is a whole different matter, because the ADHD brain quickly loses interest and focuses on something else.
Mind you, the solution I have in mind when I wake isn't necessarily the right one; but I get to the right one pretty quickly.
That’s usually when I would go for coffee when I worked in an office.
> "The growing trend, especially among young people, to multi-task may seem wonderful. But actually, multi-tasking is most likely to interfere with focused attention and, in turn, degrade memory formation, recall, and thinking quality."
Eventually I realized that parallelization is not really possible, you end up making a mess of everything, and trying to be a rapid context-switcher - similar to the illusion of simultaneous multitasking on a single CPU core - just takes too much energy and time - 15-30 min to unload, clear the slate and reload with something else seems common.
Practically, this is why people working on difficult problems that require their full attention get really irritated by interruptions, and often prefer to work in isolation or only with like-minded individuals.+
The trick is to pick a combinations that works:
* listening to a language lesson when cycling (learning+sport)
* repeating flash cards in a bus, instead of doomscrolling (commute+learning)
* listening to a language lesson when cycling to work (learning+sport+commute - whoa!)
* thinking about my programming project when cleaning my home (work+brainless menial work)
In most cases this involves something that doesn't require to much too much conscious attention and something that does.
ADHD is a blessing and a curse. I can hold every line of the codebase in my head but I can't remember what I was just doing...
You figure out how to work without working memory. Just offload it all immediately.
The lines of the codebase are also working memory, no?
So I'm happy that the article mentions another method. Apart from playing "Simon" (yes that circular game with lights), those are the only two I know.
Anyone know of any other methods?
From what I've read, the training isn't necessarily transferable. You just get better at these sorts of brain games, which doesn't necessarily mean your working memory is increasing.
Even while reading gwern's blog that seemed pretty positive of this kind of training, there was limited evidence that you shouldn't learn just a new instrument or language or new sort of math discipline.
Why do people keep thinking that "training" can improve working memory?
It's ironic that the page didn't exist and I had to go to a backup from 2014 in archive.org to find it.
https://sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/04/22/working-memory-train...
https://web.archive.org/web/20140713110043/http://sharpbrain...
Which is perhaps not without merit, but...
This was me for the first 38 years of my life. I got a degree and worked as a software developer with memory that bad.
Think of it like this. You have other rooms in your house that you don’t know what to do with. You might know how to decorate your first room, maybe even your second, but by the time you are lucky enough to have the fifth room, you won’t really know what to fill it with.
Luxury. It takes some imagination to fill it.
After training, researchers tested the children on another working memory task. Scores on this test indicated that working memory correlated with IQ test scores. That is, children with better working memory ability also had higher IQs."
> But when the complex condition of 12 attributes, results reversed. The best car was chosen most reliably in the unconscious-thought condition.
I failed to understand this.
No. Just the opposite. A quick search shows majority of the scholarly papers question "sleep learning". Maybe 16 years of new data?
e.g., https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2869....
and, as @joeyagreco noted the link is (might as well be) dead.
oh... oh god