Mark Zuckerberg famously had a term for people like you who trusted him.
back
1 comments
In case this is not clear enough: you'd better come up with some real arguments with concrete evidence, or move on. Nobody has time for meaningless speculation.
This is a rare example where I actually think Meta should be providing the evidence, and not the other way around.
When you have a history of doing greasy shit, you don't get the benefit of the doubt.
What evidence would be convincing?
How about a breakdown on the exact ways WhatsApp makes them money and how the justified value of $20 bil when meta purchased it made sense?