[0]: https://phiresky.github.io/blog/2025/visualizing-all-books-i...
But honestly, I find both of these better: - https://bwv-1011.github.io/isbn-viewer/ - https://anna.candyland.page/map-sample.html
in particular the one from bwv is technically similar but just all around better than mine, it is what I would want mine to be
But in terms of comparison of yours to bwv, I don't agree that bwv's is technically superior in every way. It lacks comparison, ISBN selection and link creation. bwv's main focus looks to be that one feature to highlight the rare books without trying to get the other requirements that AA wanted.
One thing I found odd.
I searched for 'Stubborn Attachments' which worked.
On the same bookshelf there are several other Stripe Press books.
One of them is called Zero to One Hundred, by Stephanie Friedman.
When you search that book on Amazon, it has a different title, which I guess is reasonable as the book hasn't been published yet and they may not have finalized the decision: https://a.co/d/bQX5CNf
Here's where it gets weird:
- if you search for the book 'Zero to one hundred' (the title shown on the 'shelf') it doesn't come up
- if you search for the book by its ISBN, it does come up, but the name displayed in the search results is yet another alternate title. And the bookshelf displays that title. So the same part of the bookshelf looks different depending on what you searched for.
I haven't yet read the blog post about how this impressive visualization works, so I don't have an idea of why this is the case.
If you search the ISBN on the web, you'll get "Zero to One Hundred" with the cover of "Built to Grow" and vice versa.
There's also "Experiment, Build, Scale" which is the book that the visualisation shows, also with the same ISBN attributed to the previous two.
Experiment, Build, Scale seems to be the only book of Stephanie's that is in Google Books while Worldcat has "Zero to One Hundred" with the cover art for "Built to Grow".
Most of the online bookstore pages have this mess so I wouldn't blame the tool for what seems like an upstream data quality issue.
I think that's an uncharitable read of the GP's comment. I read it as curiosity about how the upstream data issues present in the tool, which also interests the part of my brain that likes to solve minor mysteries.
I just think it's interesting that the book title shows differently on the shelf depending on whether you reach it via an ISBN search, vs. if you discover it by panning from a nearby book.
Are there no rules on how publishers have to assign their numbers? Just so they could hand back an unused block if they don't need it any longer.
[1] I can see how publishing learning material in 30 languages can give people "ideas" when assigning ISBN numbers https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hueber_Verlag
- publisher - assigned title - (roughly) order of publication
That's all that they communicate --- there is no hierarchy here to aid in discovery or to organize the content (and further complicating things, the same text may appear multiple times in a different binding --- a differentiation which is immaterial to an e-book).
The elephant in the room of course is the matter that "Anna's Archive" is not a legitimate book repository, but a piracy site, so what they are showcasing is how compleat (and brazen) their theft (and attendant lack of compensation) is.
This would be far more interesting if it were based on an hierarchical system such as LoC, and instead afforded an interface for accessing legitimately available books as are available from https://www.gutenberg.org/ or listed at: http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/ or worked on at: https://www.wikibooks.org/
I assume the task isn't just to visualize isbns literally. Presumably you are allowed to cross reference with other data.
> The elephant in the room of course is the matter that "Anna's Archive" is not a legitimate book repository, but a piracy site,
I think its pretty clear that the target audience doesn't care. I don't think the target audience holding differing political views is really a valid critcism of the project. It should be evaluated in the context and audience it was created for.
Isn't this exactly what Open Library does?
My entry is still live for now for anyone curious:
I was looking at my country's "shelve" and it's so sad to see so many missing titles. I almost wanted to go to my local livrary and digitize sone of them. The old ones that are out of print and imposible to acquire right now...
So much knowledge lost.
I say this as someone who grew up in Spanish libraries and book shops, surrounded and immersed in Spanish books, so it feels a bit strange to see the tiny bit we occupy in the world map here.
Example: Germany publishes five times more books than the Netherlands [2], and Spain publishes twice as many books as the Netherlands. However, in visualizations, Germany appears similar to the Netherlands, while Spain and Mexico do not aligned with the high-level labels [3].
[1] https://annas-archive.li/datasets
[2] https://internationalpublishers.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/...
[3] https://software.annas-archive.li/AnnaArchivist/annas-archiv...
I had the exact same question, and I do have a completely unsupported theory. There's one large block that appears to be Argentina, or possibly Peru, although their titles are on the fringes of the large block. The block is otherwise unlabled, no name sitting at the center of the block like you see with the other major ones. I would be slightly surprised if it were entirely argentina, but it would make a lot of sense if that block were Spanish.
I have two self-published books with ISBNs. Neither of them has the details in the 1st place submission (I assume it won’t be in any other as well?).
One was published on Feb 23 and the other on Dec 24. I had hoped at least the older one would be there. Does anyone know why they are not?
The ISBNs:
- 9786500718836
- 9786501276830
>We started mapping ISBNs two years ago with our scrape of ISBNdb. Since then, we have scraped many more metadata sources, such as Worldcat, Google Books, Goodreads, Libby, and more. A full list can be found on the “Datasets” and “Torrents” pages on Anna’s Archive. We now have by far the largest fully open, easily downloadable collection of book metadata (and thus ISBNs) in the world.
So, it your books would need to be present in one of the databases that Anna's Archive scraped, at the time they scraped it.
https://scis.edublogs.org/2017/09/28/the-dreaded-case-of-dup...
Libraries have been trying to collect humanity’s knowledge almost since the invention of writing. In the digital age, it might actually be possible to create a comprehensive collection of all human writing that meets certain criteria. That’s what shadow libraries do - collect and share as many books as possible.
One shadow library, Anna’s Archive (which I will not link here directly due to copyright concerns), recently posed a question: How could we effectively visualize 100,000,000 books or more at once? There’s lots of data to view: Titles, authors, which countries the books come from, which publishers, how old they are, how many libraries hold them, whether they are available digitally, etc. - https://phiresky.github.io/blog/2025/visualizing-all-books-i...
Basically, legally gray online book repositories such as Anna's Archive, who was the creator of this bounty, are trying to collect a lot of books. The question quickly arises - how many books are there?
The best way to track books is by using ISBN, international standard book number, basically the personal id of any given books, given to books by an international agency. Now that you know which books exist, you can check which books your repository already has and which ones are missing.
But ISBN covers the space of over 2 billion possible existing books. That's a lot. So, Anna's Archive has created a contest to display this space in the cleanest way possible. The winning submission is very nicely done, and in my view very well deserving of the 6,000$ bounty.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43193432
Does that count?
The thing is, if we're going to have GPL software, then we need copyright.
Yes, the terms/lengths need to be adjusted, but one can't do that by fiat/unilaterally.
I don't hate Anna's Archive though.
I would like to have had a go at this but you often only find out about these things when winners are announced.
In this case, the ISP blocked it because the website is anna's archive [2], which was blocked around a year ago, but they have not made a post about that.
If you put "pcm." in front of the link it will work (for now)
You should probably edit your post, so as not to misinform. But I have to admit this confusion stems from bad decisions at the ISP.
[1] https://www.ziggo.nl/website-geblokkeerd
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna%27s_Archive#Netherlands