(If you're wondering how you get from rubber to phones, they had rubber-coated cables and wired telephone switches along the way.)
Would that have kept them afloat as an operation? I've spent the last few decades here watching as their red-and-grey engines disappeared in a sea of yellow.
Piaggio is both aerospace and motorbikes - each having descended from a common corporate ancestor.
Philips can be two different brands of smartbulbs. They spun off the original as Hue, and then developed another line more recently.
I'm sure there are American examples too, if you look at century+ old conglomerates like GE or Boeing. NBC (formerly of GE) is about to be its own example, when CNBC and MSNBC get spun off.
Those are all motors at least, similar to Honda making a bunch of things with motors.
KTM has the motorcycle brand, but it's going through it's own restructuring/bankruptcy at the moment.
Hemingway shot himself with a gun he bought at ... Abercrombie & Fitch
This is not too unheard of even in the West.
Rolls Royce Motor Cars is owned by BMW but they just bought use of the name.
The old Rolls Royce Motors who used to make the cars was sold to VW (but not the name).
Rolls Royce Holdings Plc., the defence and aerospace firm, actually own the name but don't make cars.
Clear as mud.
Toyota was a maker of cotton looming machines before cars, and Nokia was a pulp mill and rubber manufacturer...