There's more color and I don't see here any obsession with stuff like recursion, but the preoccupation with math/data, plus what seems like technical training as a draftsman actually reminds me a lot of Escher.
As a whole the piece is amazing, but when zooming in on the details, the digital version kinda feels lifeless with too-straight lines and identical clipart. I think what gets lost in this kind of digital recreation are some of the stuff I love most from old maps: the subtle variations introduced from printing, the hand-carved lines in the hatching not being perfectly straight, the moments of bespoke difference that no standardized font or clipart captures.
The restored version is not quite the same, and that's fine especially since those details are hard to see at a glance. It's beautiful overall. I wonder though if we can use some of our newer image generation techniques to re-introduce the wonderful subtleties of the print version.