It would be fundamentalism if I was close-minded about it. I am not. If there are any alternative scientific theories that are supported by as much evidence as the theory of evolution is, I would love to hear about them.
back
1 comments
A prerequisite for a theory to be scientific is to be built on a naturalistic background. The mere fact that one asks for a scientific explanation, says much about their _ideological_ background.
But _a priori_ we can not impose any restrictions on what will explain something. We are part of what exists. We can have no expectation on what exists, why and how it works.
Some things may have a scientific explanation, some others may not. We don't get to decide. We can't restrict ourself to accepting only one kind of explanation.