back

by dosinga·1y ago·view on hn ↗
Thanks for that. This study is much more nuanced and does not really concur with the conclusions from the article at all. The article says:

    Today, almost 90% of Icelandic workers benefit from a reduced working week of 36 hours
while the study says:

    The offer of shorter hours has been widespread. In the two years prior to being surveyed, more than half (59%) of workers were offered reduced working hours.
Or am I missing something?
1 comments
I don't think you're missing anything. It was interesting to me that there didn't seem to be any measured outcomes other than "how was this rolled out?" and "how do workers feel about it?"