Better switch to Linux. It's not perfect but I am sure that you will be fine using Linux(Unless you want to use Adobe Suite or Few Corporate applications which won't be used by many)
I've never been able to get Linux working right on one of my laptops, on another only rolling releases work.
These rolling releases like to break every 3 to 6 months.
Windows is much more stable on both laptops.
With my mini PC eGPU combo Linux just won't recognize the eGpu at all.
And who is to say that Microsoft will honor the toggle, “for analytic and performance metric” purposes?
EDIT: the rant above shouldn’t cast aspersions on Brave, good on them for trying.
I'm not clamoring for any Microsoft software for the last two decades, but the idea itself is interesting, like being able to catalog and look back at what I did at specific times in the past, or be able to query "What was the website where I saw X at?", would have been useful just last week for me when I was trying to find some document I read but didn't bookmark/download.
But I'd probably trust BP to not spill oil into our oceans again over Microsoft not having security/data leak issues.
Somehow find . -iname has worked for years in Linux without AI
Well some people currently pay $19/month for that feature.
NSA, CIA, maybe even ICE nowadays.
> We were partly inspired by Signal’s blocking of Recall. Given that Windows doesn’t let non-browser apps granularly disable Recall, Signal cleverly uses the DRM flag on their app to disable all screenshots. This breaks Recall, but unfortunately also breaks the ability to take any screenshots, including by legitimate accessibility software like screen-readers. Brave’s approach does not have this limitation since we’re able to granularly disable just Recall; regular screenshotting will still work. While it’s heartening that Microsoft recognizes that Web browsers are especially privacy-sensitive applications, we hope they offer the same granular ability to turn off Recall to all privacy-minded application developers.
This is not the kind of thing you'd do if you expect app developers to be enthusiastic about the feature.
it's shitty invasive employers (e.g. amazon)
they'll be able to notice you stopped working for 2 minutes to go to the toilet and punish you accordingly
Why would you want to use a closed source OS controlled by a corporation with a past as checkered as Microsoft's?
Say when an application starts being slow for memory issues or io issues or downright freezes, I can still click a button or start typing something in that application, wait and it'll work eventually. I can push windows as far as I can, I can be absolutely careless and it'll still work.
On mint, if things start going slow, I'll stop clicking and wait for it to die so I can restart the app again. I don't feel confident enough to push it.
It's like buying a boring, easy to maintain japanese car and a fancy, one of 100, exotic super car from some obscure european brand. I know which one I can confidently thrash about.
My last hurdle which I kind of sucked up was Discord, I was holding off on it for ages, till I got irritated enough with Windows to ignore it. It didn't let me stream with audio, but when they switched from 32-bit to 64-bit it seems Linux finally got streaming with audio.
I wish I was exaggerating but I've had these arguments with people that really should know better and there was nothing I could do to convince them. There's a lot of people that are strangely proud in being completely technically illiterate and they don't care to actually have control over their computer or personal data. This isn't an age thing either; this was from people that were otherwise my age or younger that simply got angry at the mere thought of Linux.
I myself made the full switch last year with the advent of them forcing copilot shit everywhere and everything just works out of the box. I originally thought I might need to switch back to Windows every now and then for gaming but no, everything I've thrown at it works great and often better than it did on Windows. I only keep Windows around on my separate dev/work machine for the sake of game dev and coding.
> This setting applies only to Enterprise and Education editions of Windows.
That limitation looks extremely impractical.
[1]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/client-management/...
Without this loophole Recall could take pix of password managers and other such sensitive windows. So it doesn't seem closeable without per app exceptions.
But privacy is a bug on a school laptop used by a child. Brave could have a toggle on the feature if it wants to serve that market.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/client-management/...
Good on Brave for doing this, but having to continually deal with these absurd Microsoft manufactured problems has to get exhausting.
As far as I know, Recall has never been enabled by default on any Windows-PC, even the new "Copilot+ PCs", so this should not be a concern as users have to explicitely opt-in to enable this privacy-invading feature.
First it was Signal which pretended being "forced" to create such a feature. I love Signal but I found this absolutely ridiculous.
Preventing a Window to be seen by other programs has the side-effect of making it completely invisible when using Windows remotely with tools such as Sunshine. How am I supposed to use Brave or Signal if the setting to disable this feature is not accessible because I can't even see the settings screen first?
HN really loves making Microsoft (especially Windows) appear even worse as it already is...
I can't find this option under brave://settings/privacy
Why is that ?
how is this even legal?
wikileaks was 15 years ago. tech has come long way.