back
4 comments
The title here is copied from the author's post on Mastodon:

https://sigmoid.social/@raphaelmilliere/114659355740586289

"Despite extensive safety training, LLMs remain vulnerable to “jailbreaking” through adversarial prompts. Why does this vulnerability persist? In a new open access paper published in Philosophical Studies, I argue this is because current alignment methods are fundamentally shallow."

Uhhhh, no... idk who that is but this comment from you is both factually incorrect and slightly insulting. whatever hes saying is the shadow of this.
I don't know what you're reading, but I gave a link to a post on Mastodon, and then I quote directly from it.

Here's the link:

https://sigmoid.social/@raphaelmilliere/114659355740586289

Here is the text from that post:

Despite extensive safety training, LLMs remain vulnerable to “jailbreaking” through adversarial prompts. Why does this vulnerability persist? In a new open access paper published in Philosophical Studies, I argue this is because current alignment methods are fundamentally shallow.

That Mastodon post then links to a paper by the same person, so one assumes they are giving an accurate summary of their own work.

So I don't know what you are claiming is factually incorrect.