Also even if you don't want to join this particular reading, join the mailing list for the overall book club (on /bookclub.html) because we're going to read Designing Data Intensive Applications 2nd Edition together after it comes out this winter.
FWIW, he's a really great instructor and a super nice guy. Taking courses with him was a real treat.
Might be a good help to keep the enthousiasm and energy to read a technical book in its entirety!
For reference, the second edition includes two additional chapters: "Optimism and manual memory management" and "Transactional programming". Did you intentionally skip those? :)
Perhaps I didn’t see this answered in the page referenced.
How did you get word to spread to begin with? Google groups?
Is everyone welcome or there’s certain prerequisite?
Thanks for ur time.
4. Have I insulated you in any way by asking these questions? If so - please take excuse.
4. Not at all. :)
What are your goals for these reading groups? How completely are you meeting them? "Goals" in a broad sense, anywhere from "motivating myself to read more" to "building a community of experts and friends."
Also, if you sign up is this then only for this book's discussion?
I'm only comparing the TOCs here:
Chapters 1-6 have, unless I missed something, the same chapter topics and section titles.
Chapter 7 seems to be reorganized a bit and adds an exercises section.
Chapters 8 - 16 have one extra section for exercises each, I'm not seeing (quick review) any other differences in section names.
Chapter 17 becomes Chapter 18, adds an exercises section.
Chapter 18 becomes Chapter 20, several additional sections.
So the earlier edition is missing Chapter 17 "Data parallelism" and Chapter 19 "Optimism and manual memory management" from the newer edition. Only the missing Chapter 17 would impact the reading group plan since it is covering chapters 1-18.
Yes this is only for this book's discussion. The broader mailing list is on /bookclub.html. And that mailing list is used just to stay in the loop about future readings (and votes on future readings).
It's what makes it sustainable for me to keep running this group.
If the discussion is light, it's a non-issue, but with 300-800 (per eatonphil's comment) it's likely that it will not be light.
And, unrelatedly, even though few actively participate that isn't the point. It is a motivational vehicle. And I repeatedly hear about this from folks who join and don't participate. That's perfectly fine with me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoom_(software)
See the Reception section.
They had many security and privacy issues.
Some of them were in the news a lot, a few years earlier.