▲ 42 points
back
15 comments
The irony is that the civilian drone market exploded (no pun intended) because of cheap innovation, and now the same qualities (small, cheap, adaptable) make them nearly impossible to regulate without sweeping bans.
I suspect that an increasing number of countries and cities will move toward permanent drone bans, as battlefield technology inevitably filters down to organized crime—and eventually even petty crime.
Governments probably wouldn't care about hobbyists, but they would care about all the commercial enterprises that already adopted drones. Delivery drones and light shows are the most well-known, but they're also used in weather monitoring and agriculture.
Maybe this is the time for drone transponder signals? Require every drone handler to be registered, then have the drone broadcast some signal with the registration ID + some cryptographic hash?
Then shoot down everything that has no transponder or a blacklisted ID.
Yes, this will encourage ID theft (or just theft of the entire drone), but even then, a stolen ID could at least be a starting point for an investigation.
I wonder how long before Ukraine or Russia allows delivery drones.
After the deaths of most of the veterans who were traumatized by drones?
There's really no point to doing that. The drones which actually get used for attacks in places like Ukraine are not fancy off-the-shelf drones. They're very simple DIY systems made from basic electronic components. So, impossible to regulate.
Yeah, was surprised to learn that the "military grade" drones are actually simpler than the commercial/hobbyist ones, e.g. no GPS.
Of course it makes sense if you see them as "disposable material".
Also GNSS is probably not all that useful anywhere near the front, widely jammed.
A benefit is, I think, that that immediately makes any drone in the sky fair game. Makes for faster decisions when in doubt.