back

by majorchord·10mo ago·view on hn ↗
I think "playing politics" means trying to get people to change something, or how a group of people is managed. Not all projects want other people telling them what to do or what they should or shouldn't do, and I think that's perfectly ok.

If "people being themselves" means making SJW politics their entire identity and spraying it across the internet, then I'd say it's likely they're not going to be welcome in many places, CoC or not.

I think you could argue having any rule that someone happens to disagree with is telling them "you cannot be different"... people have to draw the line somewhere, or there wouldn't be rules. Who are we to say what's right or wrong in someone else's project?

And I think your argument still dismisses the weaponization that many people are seeing... maybe you call it their identity being someone who wants to change things... but that doesn't mean they should always get what they want.

1 comments
> I think "playing politics" means trying to get people to change something, or how a group of people is managed.

That's probably where the disagreement/misunderstanding is. I don't think that's a definition of "playing politics" that most people would agree with.

IDK, it seems to fit with the definition to me:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/politics

> the activities of ... people who try to influence the way a country is governed

Britannica says politics is "the opinions that someone has about what should be done."

"playing politics" itself apparently also has its own definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/play%20politics

But I moreso meant the plain politics definition.