The people worst off are Federal contractors. They are effectively unemployed during these periods. Many actual employees, like me in previous shutdowns, are essentially on irregular paid time off. In theory it is unpaid, but it is always retroactively paid in practice and everyone knows this. People that are “critical” kind of get a raw deal because they still have to work while people deemed less essential don’t have to work.
It is unfortunate that it happens but I wouldn’t get overly caught up in the theater of it all.
An important difference is that in the past employees were furloughed... but yesterday Republicans threatened they would permanently fire employees instead [0][1] and I'm not sure how it'll shake out.
Their hostage-taking threat falls flat though: They already have have a solid track record of capricious and/or illegal firings [3][4] since the election. There's no reason to expect appeasement would make them stop what they still want to do anyway.
_____________
[0] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-trump-administr...
[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/unions-file-suit-t...
[2] https://www.npr.org/2025/09/25/nx-s1-5544317/federal-probati...
[3] https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/cre...
You seem to have normalised Government shutdowns in a way to cope with it.
But this is not normal, this does not happen in a normal government process.
“The people worst off are Federal contractors. They are effectively unemployed during these periods.”
I do not know if they are worst off as hopefully they have some emergency savings, credit card, or 401k loan they can take out.
Last 4 shutdowns: 21, 16, 2, and 34 days.
I think it is highly irregular given this presidency. Reagan shut down 3 times to weaken various unions and facilities, really wielding it as a bargaining chip. Clinton shut down twice as a president with a congress that didn't align with him
Trump has now shut down the government 5 times, and the truly odd thing is how 4 times he had congress on his side. This isn't really something to just shake off.
(and for completeness. Carter had the first shutdown ever and Obama shut down once as well).
Why only in theory? Why does it get paid back in practice?
That’s rich coming from a department that has intentionally withheld money from our most vulnerable people this year.
If anyone in the DOJ cared to enforce it.
Can't generate money, only lose it then refuse to allocate what we have left.
I fear this may longer than I originally suspected.
https://i.imgur.com/3SNa03R.png
Not to mention, the graphic is extraordinarily ugly.
Republicans hold the majority... hello?
- US Conservative Majority who makes policy ...
When Republicans hold the majority Democrats can't do anything because Republicans don't let them.
https://www.nbcnews.com/data-graphics/longest-government-shu...
1. Democrats and Republicans reach a typical legislative compromise with enough votes to pass a law, declaring that federal government shall do both [A] and [B].
2. President Trump: "Meh, I just don't wanna do [B], nobody do [B] or else you're fired."
3. Republican legislators: "Sure, we didn't want [B] anyway, we'll sit back and let Trump break the law without impeaching him. We'll can spend that money for something else we like later."
So... what's the point of Democrats compromising on a package of budget laws, when the Republican party keeps conspiring to break the very laws they agreed-to but don't like?
_____________________
[0] https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/new-data-show-t...
[1] https://www.citizensforethics.org/legal-action/letters/the-t...
https://www.nbcnews.com/data-graphics/longest-government-shu...
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45423880 (NPR before the shutdown)
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45434179 (The Guardian, politically biased headline)
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45434441 (Reuters)
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45434146 (BBC News)