back
365 comments
As someone who actually worked for the Federal government when it shutdown in the past, people are exaggerating the implications for narrative purposes. This happens semi-routinely, there is a boring reality that goes along with it.

The people worst off are Federal contractors. They are effectively unemployed during these periods. Many actual employees, like me in previous shutdowns, are essentially on irregular paid time off. In theory it is unpaid, but it is always retroactively paid in practice and everyone knows this. People that are “critical” kind of get a raw deal because they still have to work while people deemed less essential don’t have to work.

It is unfortunate that it happens but I wouldn’t get overly caught up in the theater of it all.

> This happens semi-routinely, there is a boring reality that goes along with it. [...] retroactively paid in practice

An important difference is that in the past employees were furloughed... but yesterday Republicans threatened they would permanently fire employees instead [0][1] and I'm not sure how it'll shake out.

Their hostage-taking threat falls flat though: They already have have a solid track record of capricious and/or illegal firings [3][4] since the election. There's no reason to expect appeasement would make them stop what they still want to do anyway.

_____________

[0] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-trump-administr...

[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/unions-file-suit-t...

[2] https://www.npr.org/2025/09/25/nx-s1-5544317/federal-probati...

[3] https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/cre...

>As someone who actually worked for the Federal government when it shutdown in the past, people are exaggerating the implications for narrative purposes. This happens semi-routinely, there is a boring reality that goes along with it.

You seem to have normalised Government shutdowns in a way to cope with it.

But this is not normal, this does not happen in a normal government process.

I found out yesterday that it is now the law that federal employees are guaranteed back pay after a shutdown, thanks to the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019 passed after the 2019 shutdown.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/24

Except for people who are on welfare programs. They also dont get their payouts. Sure they WILL get it all back. But just because people will get to eat next month doesnt mean not eating this month isnt a problem.
It's less common that the president says he will use the shutdown to do rifs though.
Some federal contractor companies have a plan but not all do. They may allow workers leave without pay, forced them to take vacation/PTO, or critical workers are forced to come in and do 3 jobs at once but be paid while their friends/coworkers are not getting a paycheck.

“The people worst off are Federal contractors. They are effectively unemployed during these periods.”

I do not know if they are worst off as hopefully they have some emergency savings, credit card, or 401k loan they can take out.

Last 4 shutdowns: 21, 16, 2, and 34 days.

I think it's a bit worse this time since we have an unbridled President, that the SCOTUS has made King-adjacent, who wants to permanently fire a lot of the furloughed employees out of vengeance and with no clear logic other than he's angry. So this time it's not quite as matter-of-fact.
It's not unprecedented, but I think calling it "regular" is also downplaying the issue here. We've been roughly on a schedule of once per 5 years or so.

I think it is highly irregular given this presidency. Reagan shut down 3 times to weaken various unions and facilities, really wielding it as a bargaining chip. Clinton shut down twice as a president with a congress that didn't align with him

Trump has now shut down the government 5 times, and the truly odd thing is how 4 times he had congress on his side. This isn't really something to just shake off.

(and for completeness. Carter had the first shutdown ever and Obama shut down once as well).

> In theory it is unpaid, but it is always retroactively paid in practice and everyone knows this.

Why only in theory? Why does it get paid back in practice?

Are the cleaning crews federal employees? Who is taking out the trash and maintaining the restrooms during the shutdown?
> The US Department of Housing and Urban Development has added a message to the top of its website blaming the looming government shutdown on the "radical left".

That’s rich coming from a department that has intentionally withheld money from our most vulnerable people this year.

It's a Hatch Act Violation.

If anyone in the DOJ cared to enforce it.

From our most vulnerable people. And are educated populace. And the media. And even our soldiers of you look into how these deployments work.

Can't generate money, only lose it then refuse to allocate what we have left.

The official White House website now lists a banner reading “Democrats Have Shut Down the Government” with a timer.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/

I fear this may longer than I originally suspected.

Combined with the mass e-mails Trump appointees sent out within different departments, these are crimes under the Hatch Act, since they are using government resources for nakedly partisan purposes.
My favorite part is the Hero countdown timer on the index page (https://www.whitehouse.gov/) and the countdown timer graphic on the dedicated govt shutdown page (https://www.whitehouse.gov/government-shutdown-clock/) don't match:

https://i.imgur.com/3SNa03R.png

Not to mention, the graphic is extraordinarily ugly.

Interesting - I don't see that all. What CDN does that site use? I wonder if there's a caching issue on my side...
"Democrats shut down the government"

Republicans hold the majority... hello?

In various other countries, if you can't pass a budget, your governance is in question to the point that you face a new election. i.e., it is on you to negotiate more flexibly to avoid this.
"Nothing is my fault, I'm responsible for nothing, you should be angry / afraid at all times at other people and that is why you should vote for me."

- US Conservative Majority who makes policy ...

Republicans can’t Math, boss.
When Democrats hold the majority Democrats can't do anything because Republicans don't let them.

When Republicans hold the majority Democrats can't do anything because Republicans don't let them.

A majority isn't enough to end the shutdown. It takes 60 Senate votes to pass a budget, and there are only 53 Republicans in the Senate.
This is the least productive Congressional session in history. It's a tiny majority. Also, the pretend Christian head of the House refuses to swear in Adelita Grijalva who was duly elected. The modern House has very little real power compared to the Senate.
Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House. They didn't bother to show up to avert the shutdown. The House convened for 2 minutes and refused to allow any discussion yesterday.
If you have to use the "this hasn't happened since X" formulation for dramatic effect, at least do it when the time scale is actually impressive. Last time it happened was 7 years ago? That's not even 2 presidencies
How long do government shutdowns last? How often do they happen?

https://www.nbcnews.com/data-graphics/longest-government-shu...

You tired of all this winning yet?
What does it mean for air travel?
I want to point out that that a new and dangerous kind of "shutdown" was already happening before today, just in a patchy partisan manner. [0][1] In a nutshell:

1. Democrats and Republicans reach a typical legislative compromise with enough votes to pass a law, declaring that federal government shall do both [A] and [B].

2. President Trump: "Meh, I just don't wanna do [B], nobody do [B] or else you're fired."

3. Republican legislators: "Sure, we didn't want [B] anyway, we'll sit back and let Trump break the law without impeaching him. We'll can spend that money for something else we like later."

So... what's the point of Democrats compromising on a package of budget laws, when the Republican party keeps conspiring to break the very laws they agreed-to but don't like?

_____________________

[0] https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/new-data-show-t...

[1] https://www.citizensforethics.org/legal-action/letters/the-t...

We can't swear in the new senator from Arizona who coincidentally has the tie breaking vote to force the release of the Epstein files.
Does congress get paid during this time?
How long do government shutdowns last? How often do they happen?

https://www.nbcnews.com/data-graphics/longest-government-shu...

[flagged]
How in the happy fuck is this getting blamed on the minority party!?
shuts dowm?
Finally. That was a terrible government. Hopefully its replaced with something even halfway servicable.
Here's a collection for dang/tomhow, as this is (as it always has in the past) going to collect duplicates as everyone posts their own news source's version:

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45423880 (NPR before the shutdown)

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45434179 (The Guardian, politically biased headline)

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45434441 (Reuters)

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45434146 (BBC News)

Paraphrasing a comedian during one of the previous shutdowns: "If they're still taking money out of my paycheck, it's not shut down."