Item — HN Reader

>For security reasons, we can't delete an account for you. You’ll need to be able to log into your account to request deletion. If you can't remember your password or username, see some tips for logging in.

First option doesn't seem to work given I cannot log in (SSO issue in post -- I don't have a "password" to Instagram, only to make use of FB SSO).

>File DMCA takedown notices with them for your photos, you own the copyright. You can leverage US copyright to its full extent in this use case. Instagram is under no obligation to enable your participation on the platform, but you remain the owner of the content associated with the account.

Thanks, this is the kind of legal hack I was looking for.

I filled out a DMCA form linking to every photo on the account and stated that since they won't let me log into said account, I am revoking consent for use of all images.

I will post back here when I hear back.

At the "meta" level (no pun intended), I worry for Facebook's stock price if returning users are arbitrarily denied the ability to manage their public facing digital identity.

We grow and change over time -- edit our biographies, our avatars, which art is most prominent. To claim someone is so "inauthentic" they must be banned from the platform but to continue hosting their content seems absurd. I've mostly heard of such policies being directed at things like election disinformation or COVID skepticism, not... nightshots of the Tokyo skyline. And if I was "inauthentic", should my content be wiped so my disinformation can't be spread further?

It hurts my feelings, on a personal level, having joined as a college freshman to return to feelings of arbitrary punishment I thought we leave behind in K12, especially given that I've been nothing but kind on the platform in the past.

1 comments

I'll say that you should not feel bad about this. Meta doesn't care about you, they are like Oracle, a lawnmower. As long as they print money, they will do whatever they want without any concern or care for humans on or adjacent to their platform. They don't care about you, or anyone else who uses their services. Hope the legal hack helps! Wishing you good luck in this matter.

> "As you know people, as you learn about things, you realize that these generalizations we have are, virtually to a generalization, false. Well, except for this one, as it turns out. What you think of Oracle, is even truer than you think it is. There has been no entity in human history with less complexity or nuance to it than Oracle. And I gotta say, as someone who has seen that complexity for my entire life, it's very hard to get used to that idea. It's like, 'surely this is more complicated!' but it's like: Wow, this is really simple! This company is very straightforward, in its defense. This company is about one man, his alter-ego, and what he wants to inflict upon humanity -- that's it! ...Ship mediocrity, inflict misery, lie our asses off, screw our customers, and make a whole shitload of money. Yeah... you talk to Oracle, it's like, 'no, we don't fucking make dreams happen -- we make money!' ...You need to think of Larry Ellison the way you think of a lawnmower. You don't anthropomorphize your lawnmower, the lawnmower just mows the lawn, you stick your hand in there and it'll chop it off, the end. You don't think 'oh, the lawnmower hates me' -- lawnmower doesn't give a shit about you, lawnmower can't hate you. Don't anthropomorphize the lawnmower. Don't fall into that trap about Oracle." - Bryan Cantril

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

I get they don't care about me as an individual, but companies tend to be 'lawful evil' -- if something is in their best interest (like a user returning to a site they boycotted for many ears to add eyeballs to ads), it's confusing and annoying when they don't seem to follow their own incentive structure.

Anyways, it's with their legal dept now so I'll try to put the blue site out of my mind and enjoy better venues like the orange site :-)