In Comments
Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.
Please don't pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Find something interesting to respond to instead.
Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.
the source code reveals a platform that:
- files Suspicious Activity Reports directly with FinCEN
- files Suspicious Transaction Reports with FINTRAC
- tags STRs with intelligence program codenames (Project SHADOW, Project LEGION…)
- maintains biometric face databases with 3-year retention
- runs 269 distinct verification checks against every user
- compares your selfie to political figures with facial similarity scoring
- flags you as a “suspicious entity” based on your face alone
- classifies selfie spoof risk with hardcoded rejection thresholds
- screens against 14 categories of adverse media from terrorism to espionage
- lets operators upload custom FinCEN screening lists and run them against everyone
- continuously re-screens on configurable intervals
- tracks you across 13 types of lists from browser fingerprints to geolocations
- screens crypto wallets against sanctioned addresses via Chainalysis
- runs experimental unnamed ML models on your biometric data
- encrypts data with shared symmetric keys while admitting they “depend on obfuscation”
- runs two parallel PEP screening systems with known incompatibilities
and the company that runs all of this is the same one that takes your passport photo when you sign up for ChatGPT. same codebase. same platform. different deployment. same facial recognition. same screening algorithms. same data model.
An experience yes but one that is noisy to the information you’re trying to expose.
Deflecting criticism of the noisiness because you want to focus on the content is just creating another distraction to discuss instead of the content. The cat, the music, the lowercase text, low contrast color scheme all create a layer of “is this serious?”
also while yes i agree that it could raise questions about "is this serious?" to be honest i believe my track record in the field is enough to outweigh the design of my site. i designed this website when i was a teenager, many years ago, to express my vibe and soul, and i would much rather it stay that way even if it makes it seem less serious
So Anthropic partners with Palantir and now we have this..
Music blaring, things bouncing in front of text, and the link goes a page that says nothing about OpenAI.
The music is awesome, I left the page open in the background so I can listen to it. It's just gameboy-era chiptunes.
It was aspirational projection. That is what the American oligarchy is trying to build.
1984 is coming to the west.