> According to the written judgment, ICC Judge Raquel Agnello KC noticed early in cross-examination that Jakštys frequently paused before responding to questions that were being interpreted for him. Those pauses became long enough that defense counsel Sarah Walker raised a concern that she could hear interference from the area around the witness and asked that he remove his glasses, noting that smart glasses capable of audio communication exist.
> The Lithuanian interpreter then reported that she could hear voices apparently emanating from the glasses themselves, prompting the judge to identify them as smart glasses and to direct that they be removed.
> Judge Agnello records that, after the glasses were removed and while the interpreter was in the middle of translating another question, Jakštys' mobile phone suddenly began broadcasting a voice from his inner jacket pocket. The court noted that the audio was clearly of someone speaking to Jakštys, and ordered both the smartglasses and the handset be handed to his solicitor.