back
1 comments
I like that you've chosen to use an actual element for the example / explainer.

To streamline the UI, might I suggest replacing example element (copper) with just the explainers, next to hydrogen [2]... using that elements information (without adding a free-floating copper).

If that doesn't make sense, let me know.

Thanks for being a responsive educator.

[2] perhaps use Beryllium for your example/explainer -- because then you can explain the electron orbitals too ..?

----

Replace the topbar (color==atomic class) location to between Group II & III elements (e.g. whitespace between Be B); does not need to be explained on example element text.

check now. And thanks, appreciate the praise, was fun making this thing.
Bruhhh this came out so nice for'real:

>> <https://i.imgur.com/hswLkAt.png>

Beryllium finally has a use (as explanatory element)! The American Chemical Society rejoices...

----

Text to add:

>Electron configuration

>Density (with units)

>State of matter @STP (cannot remember?! something like 27°C at one atmosphere — embarassed to not remember, I used to teach this stuff!)

----

Lastly, your current webpage title/header is:

>>Interactive Table | Periodic Table of Elements

When I go to bookmark I reduce this to

>Periodic Table of Elements .org (quick reference)

Be the Referenced namesake to which you've already expressed desire.

I tried playing with making the elements a bit more full but then it feels too cluttered. So I think the tool tip is good for now till maybe I figure out a way to add other stuff into it but not feel to cluttered.

I updated the Title to show the .org, but also in the mean time picked up https://periodictableofelements.com so working on that as well to make one the educational and the other to support any costs it might ever have and for any traffic leak I guess.