I'm surprised that his fascination with "Christian AI" and the end of the world didn't come up.
back
2 comments
Gelsinger is a weird dude. Back in the late 1990's (early 2000s?) he had the pope bless a wafer which he then claimed was extended to the a fab. We were all a little uncomfortable about it when he announced it during a BUM (internal Business Update Meeting) like why does god care if our fabs will be successful because he met the pope? He always would bring his religion to work and it made everyone uncomfortable. (And the dude only has a honarary PHD, like Mike Tyson.)
Speaking of that, Anthropic is getting priests to try and teach Claude ethics
https://observer.com/2026/03/the-catholic-priest-who-helped-write-anthropics-ai-ethics-code/Who's going to teach the Catholic priests ethics?
Claude :)
Circular ethics, how appropriate for an industry fueled by circular financing.
Grok.
What a joke. Anthropic could just train a few more times on the Bible.
Matthew 22:36-40 (emphasis mine), "Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
Note the "as thyself" part. This part counters people who want to interpret "love" as "romantic love". Unfortunately, Catholic priests and many (fake?) Christians seem to not care about the "as thyself" part.
You should read Asimov ;)
I’ve seen the TV show but don’t know what you mean. If you want to say something then say it
Asimov's 3 laws of robotics I assumed to be general knowledge around here, but here you go
Thou shall not make a machine in the likeness of man. Oh wait that is Dune :).
I think what OP meant is Asimov's stories revolve around issues arising from loopholes or some interpretation of the three laws of robotics.
Correct, I meant it in a more general way.
Asimov’s favorite overarching theme is that whenever you try to constraint robot/AI ethics with rules, creative misinterpretations or misunderstandings tend to have outsized impact.
Yes, that is my main takeaway to. Adn that is why all the talk about AI alignment/safety seem pointless to me.