It helps when the source you include supports the claims you make of it. The source you included does not:

> Obviously we want them to be wearing body cameras

First, read the post you linked before. Second, the "but the other side is bad too", even if true (and i am sure it will be true for some) is the most birdbrain take. Do you think the democrat will suddenly have 6 supreme court judges authorizing this kind of shit?

Cool counterfactual, bro.