> Vague innuendo

There is no innuendo. The only claim in this discussion is trying to cast doubt on semantics such as whether "destroyed" or "damaged" has a meaningful difference.

In the meantime, let's verify what the US government classifies as "damage".

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyd07m7e1xo

This doesn't even fit the old "the front fell off" skit.