> If it was true
Of course it is true. That is why I explained the length of my relevant experience.
> you could explain how and why
Why bother to an annoying troll?
ELI5:
My job is to understand complicated computer stuff and explain it in easy words.
My editor's job is to write headlines that will get people to read what I wrote.
I know the tech. The editor knows the readers.
That's not how things work. It's literally an appeal to authority fallacy.
Why bother to an annoying troll?
That's dismissive, but you've had so many chances and instead of explaining anything you have to resort to insults.
My editor's job is to write headlines that will get people to read what I wrote.
So just admit it's a terrible headline, stop trying to play both sides and say it's fine while also taking no responsibility.
If you want to pin it on your editor, at least admit it's intentional low information clickbait 'journalism'.
If you don't want to admit that then explain how it isn't true.
You can't do any of these things after so many chances and your 'journalism' skills seem like all they have taught you is school yard insults.