back

by mooreds·1mo ago·view on hn ↗
> Camarota does raise a fair point: US-born children of immigrants would not exist in the United States had their parents not immigrated. If the goal is to estimate the total fiscal effects attributable to immigration, then including those children alongside their parents is a reasonable exercise. Of course, that argument also means we should include the grandchildren of immigrants in the analysis because they wouldn’t be here without immigrants either. Great-grandchildren too. On second thought, Camarota doesn’t have such a good argument.

Nice bit of shade.

1 comments
If you do that math then you need to do it for non-immigrants as well in which case... his argument stands. If you want to go back 3 or more generations, then effectively all Europeans are immigrants so the math falls apart. The definition of terms is key because without it the math is meaningless. ...Basically, immigration is a net good, economically, as we have known for centuries.