> This is a common claim, but honestly, citation needed.
FWIW, here's the quick & dirty argument for that:
Assume:
- We're working within a given generation of disk technology, with comparable drive and interface tech.
- The drives' I/O speed is relatively constant, not scaling with the drive capacity.
- The chance of any given bit (of data on a disk) going bad, in a given time interval, is relatively constant.
- The drives, regardless of size, will be some fixed-ish percentage full. (If nothing else, the boss won't sign off on overspending for unneeded capacity.)
From there - the time needed for resilvering scales linearly with the drive size. As does the number of non-redundant bits that could go bad in any given second of the resilvering. Linear time linear - so the chance of data loss during resilvering rises with the square of the disk size.