Item — HN Reader

> LTS is more relevant if there was any kind of compatibility that was broken

Do we know 100% for certain that this isn't the case? No.

In fact it would be naive to think a rewrite of this magnitude wouldn't introduce new bugs and/or unexpected changes in behavior.

> Nothing to me suggests they’re being careless here.

Plenty of reasons suggest this including the lack of an LTS or any kind of thought put into such a massive transition.

1 comments

Again, the code’s been out for two months. And by many accounts, many people would clearly love to scream loudly about all the things that broke.

There were initial analyses done on the port. And things continue to get refactored. But is there any slam dunk article where someone actually found any regression in functionality or stability? We’re seeing the opposite. Dozens of bugs fixed. We don’t have to theorize. They’ve been running this experiment for 2 months, with all the code out in the open.

It just feels like after two months, people want to cling to the _idea_ that this was reckless, without evidence of any meaningful negative impact.