This is getting worse with AI, as things move too fast for anyone to verify, and AI is getting better at washing things.
What are you going to do when someone takes your thing with AI and then you're asked to prove it's yours, disputing their mountain of AI generated evidence? The legal system is not prepared to handle what's coming.
Unless the work is higher end theres just so much hassle working with humans. You got to do a casting call, wait weeks to get 100 applicants, listen to all of them, and pray that the VA still actually does a good job. Ive hired VAs in the past and unless the work is very high end, we choose AI and this trend doesnt seem to be stopping.
For consumers, they dont seem to notice or care. For instance, all those movie recap videos you see on youtube? All AI narration. Those still get 100k+ views
Also, a huge amount of VO has been literally unpaid. Producers often tell the story of learning from clients paying for good VO that it took them years to make the journey from having employees / friends etc "just talk it" and find out that "talking" is actually acting. "They don't pay for it until they learn they have to," one advertising agency founder told me over ten years ago. AI is slowing their journey to paying for good voice actors.
I used to hire owners of talent agencies, owners of recording studios, owners of advertising agencies to speak and train at our nearly 80 large public events (the Voice Acting Expo) at conference hotels, and learned a lot of "from the horse's mouth" info about the inside of the industry. We would record as many as 350 sessions/day, each with a studio room, coach, engineer, script and admin for every few room. Scheduling nightmare, but tons of fun.
Cuz i agree, if theres good acting, good voices, paying humans is a no brainer. Theres just so much sludge and it feels hard to get into contact with good VAs
But the animation and video game and social media meme generation knew from near birth was voice acting was, and the "instant success" of the early pandemic driving huge numbers to establised VOs on online marketplace led to the next marketing glut: "Look how I easily I make $10,000/mo".
The ease of (starting on) the marketplaces, the rise of the least-talented at age of "I want to do this", most interested in voiceover generation combined with the get-rich-quick from home just blitzed everywhere with no-quality, no business skill newbies. Just an astonishing locust storm, and virtually all of the "how to" information they are consuming is out-of-date, leading to a lowering of already low business skills. As you say, the difficulty seen in finding a good VA gives a different picture than too many buyers want AI. Almost all the NON buyers want AI.
Then your time cost of finding VA(1+ month) and paying them is a smaller fraction overall
Has anyone done an employee-coöperative tech start-up?
If preaching worked there would be no more violent crime or war.
The AI company then used the actor's likeness to create AI videos with the actor's face. The problem was that the public judged the quality of the AI videos as low quality. Whether that judgment was true or just prejudice, it ended up tarnishing the actor's image as cheap as well. The actor became stuck as a low quality actor who could not land any major roles.
These days, users perceive AI as low quality, yet they create so much with it and consume so much of it. The irony is that if this keeps up, humans might end up imitating AI.